Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Evaluation of CXCL9 and CXCL10 as circulating biomarkers of human cardiac allograft rejection

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
6 Mar 2006 Submitted Original manuscript
3 Apr 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Luciano Adorini
6 Apr 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Marja Steenman
3 May 2006 Author responded Author comments - Per-Arne Svensson
Resubmission - Version 2
3 May 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 2
8 May 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Luciano Adorini
16 May 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Marja Steenman
29 May 2006 Author responded Author comments - Per-Arne Svensson
Resubmission - Version 3
29 May 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 3
15 Jun 2006 Author responded Author comments - Per-Arne Svensson
Resubmission - Version 4
15 Jun 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
19 Jun 2006 Editorially accepted
19 Jun 2006 Article published 10.1186/1471-2261-6-29

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement