Predictors and prognosis of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in general practice in the UK
© Ruigómez et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2005
Received: 18 January 2005
Accepted: 11 July 2005
Published: 11 July 2005
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|18 Jan 2005||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|8 Feb 2005||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Gregory Lip|
|15 Mar 2005||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Lars Frost|
|1 Apr 2005||Author responded||Author comments - Ana Ruigomez|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|1 Apr 2005||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|22 Apr 2005||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Lars Frost|
|16 May 2005||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Alexandra Budinsky|
|26 May 2005||Author responded||Author comments - Ana Ruigomez|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|26 May 2005||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|20 Jun 2005||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Alexandra Budinsky|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|7 Jul 2005||Author responded||Author comments - Ana Ruigomez|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|7 Jul 2005||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|11 Jul 2005||Editorially accepted|
|11 Jul 2005||Article published||10.1186/1471-2261-5-20|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.