Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Outcome after acute myocardial infarction: a comparison of patients seen by cardiologists and general physicians

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
24 May 2004 Submitted Original manuscript
22 Jun 2004 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ian Scott
22 Jul 2004 Author responded Author comments - Ibrahim Abubakar
Resubmission - Version 2
22 Jul 2004 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
3 Aug 2004 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ian Scott
4 Aug 2004 Author responded Author comments - Ibrahim Abubakar
Resubmission - Version 4
4 Aug 2004 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
5 Aug 2004 Author responded Author comments - Ibrahim Abubakar
Resubmission - Version 6
5 Aug 2004 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
6 Aug 2004 Editorially accepted
6 Aug 2004 Article published 10.1186/1471-2261-4-14

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement