Table 3 Prevalence of coronary anomalies in previous published studies
Author/year of publication | Prevalence (%) | Most common coronary anomaly | Imaging modality | Country |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Yamanaka et al. 1990 [1] | 1.30 (1,686 of 126,595) | Absent LMCA with separate origin of LAD and LCX | CAG | USA |
Kaku et al. 1996 [2] | 0.31 (56 of 17,731) | Anomalous origin of RCA from LSV | CAG | Japan |
Kardos et al. 1997 [3] | 1.34 (103 of 7,694) | Absent LMCA with separate origin of LAD and LCX | CAG | Central Europe |
Garg et al. 2000 [4] | 0.95 (39 of 4,100 | Anomalous origin of RCA from LSV/NAS | CAG | India |
Yildiz et al. 2010 [5] | 0.90 (112 of 12,457) | Absent LMCA with separate origin of LAD and LCX | CAG | Turkey |
Erol et al. 2011 [6] | 1.96 (53 of 2,096) | Absent LMCA with separate origin of LAD and LCX/Origin of RCA from LSV | 64MDCT | Turkey |
Fujimoto et al. 2011 [7] | 1.52 (89 of 5,869) | Anomalous origin of RCA from LSV | 64MDCT | Japan |
Sivri et al. 2012 [8] | 0.74 (95 of 12,814) | LCX arising from RSV or RCA | CAG | Turkey |
Sohrabi et al. 2012 [9] | 1.30 (79 of 6,065) | Absent LMCA with separate origin of LAD and LCX | CAG | Iran |
Xu et al. 2012 [10] | 1.02 (124 of 12,415) | Anomalous origin of RCA from LSV | Dual-source CTCA | China |
Yukel et al. 2013 [11] | 0.29 (48 of 16,573) | Anomalous origin of LCX from RCA/RSV | CAG | Turkey |