Table 5 Classification of nutritional status using and comparison of risk level to CVDs using BFP, VFL, WC, and WHR against BMI, N = 68 (M = 29, F = 39), Gondar, Ethiopia
| Â | BMI | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Underweight N (%) | Normal N (%) | Over weight N (%) | Obese N (%) | Total N (%) | |
BFP* Normal | 1 (50) | 9 (27.3) | 0 | 0 | 10 (14.7) |
Overweight | 1 (50) | 14 (42.4) | 10 (45.5) | 3 (27.3) | 28 (41.2) |
Obese | 0 | 10 (30.3) | 12 (54.5) | 8 (72.7) | 30 (44.1) |
Total N (%) | 2 (2.9) | 33 (48.5) | 22 (32.4) | 11 (16.2) | 68 (100) |
VFL** Low risk | 2 (100) | 29 (87.9) | 8 (36.4) | 1 (9.1) | 40 (58.8) |
Increased risk | 0 | 4 (12.1) | 11 (50) | 2 (18.2) | 17 (25) |
Very increased risk | 0 | 0 | 3 (13.6) | 8 (72.7) | 11 (16.2) |
Total | 2 (2.9) | 33 (48.5) | 22 (32.4) | 11 (16.2) | 68 (100) |
WC (cm)*** Low risk | 2 (100) | 14 (42.4) | 2 (9.1) | 0 | 18 (26.5) |
Increased risk | 0 | 8 (24.3) | 7 (31.8) | 0 | 15 (22) |
Substantially increased risk | 0 | 11 (33.3) | 13 (59.1) | 11 (100) | 35 (51.5) |
Total N (%) | 2 (2.9) | 33 (48.5) | 22 (32.4) | 11 (16.2) | 68 (100) |
WHR**** Low risk | 2 (100) | 8 (24.4) | 7 (31.8) | 1 (9.1) | 18 (26.5) |
Increased risk | 0 | 25 (75.6) | 15 (68.2) | 10 (90.9) | 50 (73.5) |
Total | 2 (2.9) | 33 (48.5) | 22 (32.4) | 11 (16.2) | 68 (100) |
WHtR***** Low risk | 2 (100) | 6 (18.2) | 0 | 0 | 8 (11.8) |
Increased risk | 0 | 22 (66.7) | 13 (59.1) | 0 | 35 (51.5) |
Substantially increased risk | 0 | 5 (15.1) | 9 (40.9) | 11 (100) | 25 (36.8) |
Total N (%) | 2 (2.9) | 33 (48.5) | 22 (32.4) | 11 (16.2) | 68 (100) |