Skip to main content

Table 5 The influence of HTN, DD and DM on EF/Sm(avg) correlation and Sm(avg)

From: The relationship between mitral annular systolic velocity and ejection fraction in patients with preserved global systolic function of the left ventricle

Participants (n=308)

Controls (n=70)

HTN (n=56)

HTN/ DD (n=65)

HTN/DM (n=52)

HTN/DM/DD (n=65)

p-value

Pearson’s (r)

0.936 (p=0.030)

0.882 (p=0.002)

0.906 (p=0.045)

0.948 (p=0.004)

0.963 (p=0.022)

0.543

Sm(avg) (cm/s)

10.4–10.2

10.2–9.9

9.8–8.8

10.2–8.8

8.8–8.3

0.04

EF (%, mean ±SD)

66±2

65±2

64-62

65-62

62-61

<0.0001