Skip to main content

Table 4 Association of both standard and highly sensitive cardiac troponin I assays with an echo diagnosis of definite HCM, using logistic regression analysis

From: Use of a highly-sensitive cardiac troponin I assay in a screening population for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a case-referent study

 

Odds ratio (95% CI)

P value

Pseudo R2

AUROC (95% CI)

cTnI models

Model 1*

Natural log of cTnI

4.20 (0.94, 18.80)

0.060

0.102

0.66 (0.51, 0.82)

Model 2 **

2.56 (0.54, 12.14)

0.236

0.197

0.76 (0.62, 0.91)

hsTnI models

Model 1*

Natural log of hsTnI

2.35 (1.39, 3.96)

0.001

0.173

0.78 (0.65, 0.90)

Model 2 **

 

1.82 (1.02, 3.24)

0.042

0.231

0.81 (0.70, 0.93)

  1. * Model 1 adjusted for age and sex.
  2. ** Model 2 adjusted for age, sex, presence of group 2 ECG abnormalities, and symptoms of dyspnoea, chest pain, syncope or palpitations.
  3. Footnote: For the ln(cTnI): comparison between AUROC in Model 1 vs Model 2: χ2=1.90, p=0.168. For the ln(hsTnI): comparison between AUROC in Model 1 vs Model 2: χ2=1.03, p=0.310. For the comparison between the AUROCs in Model 2 for the models with ln(cTnI) and ln(hsTnI): χ2= 0.87, p=0.351.