Skip to main content

Table 4 Summary of quality assessment of 23 included papers (reporting 22 included studies)

From: A qualitative synthesis of factors influencing maintenance of lifestyle behaviour change in individuals with high cardiovascular risk

Section and sub-section of tool

No. items

Item most often addressed (number of studies*)

Item least often addressed (number of studies*)

Background

1

Is it clear what is being studied? (23)

N/A - only one item in this sub-section

Research team and reflexivity

  Personal characteristics

5

Is the gender of the researcher clear? (15†)

Were the characteristics of the interviewer reported (bias, assumptions, reasons and interests in the topic? (1†)

  Relationships established

2

Is there evidence that the researcher/interviewer had any informal contact with the participant before the study commenced (i.e. ‘chats’)? (4†)

Did the researcher/interviewer indicate if there was a previous therapeutic or personal relationship with the participant and if so, was this described? (1†)

Study design

  Analytic framework

1

Was use of an analytic framework mentioned (e.g. grounded theory, discourse analysis, ethnography phenomenology, content or thematic analysis? (19†)

N/A - only one item in this sub-section

  Participant selection

4

Does the study state how many took part in the interviews? (23)

Does the study state how many refused or dropped out and does it provide reasons? (10†)

  Setting

3

Are the relevant characteristics of the sample reported (demographics)? (22†)

Does the researcher state if anyone else was present during the interviews? (8)

  Data collection

7

Does the author say how many interviews were carried out? (23)

Does the study state if supplementary field notes were made during/after the interview or focus groups (9) and was data saturation discussed? (9†)

Data analysis and findings

  Data analysis

6

Does the author state if themes were identified in advance or from the data? (23)

Did the authors report checking back with informants over interpretation? (6)

  Reporting

5

Were major themes clearly presented in the findings? (23†)

Are all participant quotations labelled according to participant? (12†)

Ethics

2

Was informed consent obtained from all study participants? (17†)

Does the study report if ethical approval was obtained? (14†)

  1. *The number of studies completely or partially addressing each item.
  2. † (Some studies partially addressed this item).