Skip to main content

Table 1 Physicians' characteristics, clinical practice and experience according to speciality and health care setting

From: The health care setting rather than medical speciality impacts on physicians adherence to guideline-conform anticoagulation in outpatients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: a cross sectional survey

 

All

N = 226

Ambulatory care

N = 150 (66.4%)

Hospital care N = 76 (33.6%)

  

GP

(N = 54)

IM

(N = 65)

CA

(N = 31)

 

Male N (%)

179 (79.2)

50 (92.6)

49 (75.4)#

27 (87.1)

53 (69.7)*

Experience N (%)

     

- 5-10 years

36 (15.1)

1 (1.9)

3 (4.6)

0 (0)

31 (40.8)

- 10-15 years

40 (16.8)

11 (20.4)

9 (13.9)

7 (23.3)

12 (15.8)

- > 15 years

162 (68.1)

42 (77.7)

53 (81.5)

23 (76.7)

33 (43.4)*

Case load (6 months)

     

- none

13 (5.4)

4 (7.4)

7 (10.8)

0 (0)

2 (2.6)

- 1 - 5

139 (57.7)

44 (81.5)

48 (73.9)

11 (35.5)

28 (36.8)

- > 5

89 (36.9)

6 (11.1)

10 (15.3)

20 (64.5)§

46 (60.5)*

Use of Guidelines

     

- Rarely

81 (36)

38 (70.4)

30 (46.2)

3 (9.7)

10 (13.3)

- often

108 (48)

14 (25.9)

29 (44.6)

15 (48.4)

50 (66.7)

- always

36 (16)

2 (3.7)

6 (9.2)Â¥

13 (41.9)§

15 (20.0)*

Adverse events during OAC initiation

     

- reported N (% of physicians)

98 (43.4)

11 (20.4)

27 (41.5)

10 (32.3)

50 (65.8)**

- thromboembolism

52 (53.1)

6 (54.5)

17 (63.0)

10 (100.0)

19 (38.0)

- bleeding

48 (49.0)

2 (18.2)

5 (18.5)

2 (20.0)

39 (78.0)

- skin necrosis

31 (31.6)

3 (27.3)

14 (51.9)

0 (0)

14 (28.0)

  1. *p < 0.05 vs. ambulatory care setting (GP, IM, CA); #p < 0.05 vs. GP and vs. CA; §p < 0.05 vs. GP and vs. IM; ¥p < 0.05 vs. GP; ** 98 out of the 226 participants (43.4%) reported a total of 131 adverse events, due to multiple responses the percentage sum exceeds 100%, physicians in the hospital setting reported significantly more adverse events compared to physicians in ambulatory care (p < 0.05)