Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Manual versus mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation. An experimental study in pigs

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
24 Mar 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
8 May 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Irene Lang
10 May 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sten Rubertsson
20 Jun 2010 Author responded Author comments - Stig Steen
Resubmission - Version 2
20 Jun 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 2
10 Aug 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Irene Lang
10 Aug 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sten Rubertsson
10 Sep 2010 Author responded Author comments - Stig Steen
Resubmission - Version 3
10 Sep 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
20 Oct 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sten Rubertsson
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
28 Oct 2010 Editorially accepted
28 Oct 2010 Article published 10.1186/1471-2261-10-53

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement