Manual versus mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation. An experimental study in pigs
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|24 Mar 2010||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|8 May 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Irene Lang|
|10 May 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sten Rubertsson|
|20 Jun 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Stig Steen|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|20 Jun 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|10 Aug 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Irene Lang|
|10 Aug 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sten Rubertsson|
|10 Sep 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Stig Steen|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|10 Sep 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|20 Oct 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sten Rubertsson|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|28 Oct 2010||Editorially accepted|
|28 Oct 2010||Article published||10.1186/1471-2261-10-53|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.