Skip to main content

Table 3 Regression analysis of the interaction between vital exhaustion and flow-mediated dilatation/carotid artery compliance in relation to IMT

From: Sex differences in the combined effect of chronic stress with impaired vascular endothelium functioning and the development of early atherosclerosis: The Cardiovascular Risk in Young Finns study

 

R2*

R2change**

p

N

FMD responses

FMD x VE1

0.129

0.000

0.984

1602

(all FMD responses)

    

#FMD x VE1

0.175

0.000

0.678

985

(all FMD responses)

    

FMD x VE1 (women)

0.109

0.000

0.796

949

#FMD x VE1 (women)

0.129

0.001

0.335

555

FMD x VE1 (men)

0.136

0.001

0.483

653

#FMD x VE1 (men)

0.189

0.000

0.631

430

CAC responses

CAC x VE 1

0.121

0.001

0.250

1715

(all CAC responses)

    

#CAC x VE 1

0.167

0.001

0.358

1076

(all CAC responses)

    

CAC x VE1 (women)

0.108

0.000

0.651

999

#CAC x VE1 (women)

0.135

0.003

0.185

593

CAC x VE 1 (men)

0.124

0.005

0.046

716

#CAC x VE 1 (men)

0.177

0.009

0.025

483

  1. Note. VE = vital exhaustion, FMD = flow-mediated dilatation (%), CAC = carotid artery compliance (%/10 mmHg).
  2. 1 The main effects were included in each analysis, but they are not presented in the table.
  3. *Calculated for the whole model.
  4. **Refers to the interaction term.
  5. #Additionally adjusted for cardiovascular risk factors: LDL-cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, triglycerides, systolic and diastolic blood pressure.