Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Accuracy of advanced versus strictly conventional 12-lead ECG for detection and screening of coronary artery disease, left ventricular hypertrophy and left ventricular systolic dysfunction

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
8 Dec 2009 Submitted Original manuscript
15 Jan 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Rautaharju M
24 Jan 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Elsayed Z. Soliman
5 Feb 2010 Author responded Author comments - Todd Schlegel
Resubmission - Version 2
5 Feb 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 2
5 Feb 2010 Author responded Author comments - Todd Schlegel
Resubmission - Version 3
5 Feb 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
5 Feb 2010 Author responded Author comments - Todd Schlegel
Resubmission - Version 4
5 Feb 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 4
26 Feb 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Elsayed Z. Soliman
20 Apr 2010 Author responded Author comments - Todd Schlegel
Resubmission - Version 5
20 Apr 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 5
11 Jun 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Elsayed Z. Soliman
14 Jun 2010 Author responded Author comments - Todd Schlegel
Resubmission - Version 6
14 Jun 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
16 Jun 2010 Editorially accepted
16 Jun 2010 Article published 10.1186/1471-2261-10-28

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement