Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Effects of renal denervation on cardiac oxidative stress and local activity of the sympathetic nervous system and renin-angiotensin system in acute myocardial infracted dogs

  • Qiaoli Feng1,
  • Chengzhi Lu2Email author,
  • Li Wang2,
  • Lijun Song3,
  • Chao Li2 and
  • Ravi Chandra Uppada1
Contributed equally
BMC Cardiovascular DisordersBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201717:65

DOI: 10.1186/s12872-017-0498-1

Received: 21 June 2016

Accepted: 9 February 2017

Published: 17 February 2017

Abstract

Background

This study sought to evaluate the therapeutic effects of renal denervation (RDN) on acute myocardial infarction (MI) in canines and explore its possible mechanisms of action.

Methods

Eighteen healthy mongrel dogs were randomly assigned to either the control group, the MI group or the MI + RDN group. To assess cardiac function, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (LVEDD), left ventricular end-systolic dimension (LVESD) and fraction shortening (FS) were recorded. Additionally, haemodynamic parameters such as left ventricular systolic pressure (LVSP), left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) and heart rate (HR) were measured. Cardiac oxidative stress levels were evaluated based on the expression of p47phox mRNA, malondialdehyde (MDA), anti-superoxide anion free radical (ASAFR) and activity of superoxide dismutase (SOD). To measure the local activity of the sympathetic nervous system (SNS) and renin-angiotensin system (RAS), the levels of tyrosine hydroxylase (TH), angiotensin II (AngII), angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), angiotensin (1–7) [Ang(1–7)] and Mas receptor (MasR) in myocardial tissues were recorded. The expression of TH in renal tissue and serum creatinine were used to assess the effectiveness of the RDN procedure and renal function, respectively.

Results

We found that MI deteriorated heart function and activated cardiac oxidative stress and the local neurohumoral system, while RDN partially reversed these changes. Compared with the control group, parameters including LVEDD, LVESD, LVEDP and the levels of ASAFR, MDA, p47phox,ACE2, Ang(1–7), MasR, AngII and TH-positive nerves were increased (all P < 0.05) in myocardial infracted dogs; meanwhile, LVEF, FS, LVSP and SOD expression were decreased (all P < 0.05). However, after RDN therapy, these changes were significantly improved (P < 0.05), except that there were no significant differences observed in FS or LVSP between the two groups (P = 0.092 and 0.931, respectively). Importantly, the expression of TH, AngII and Ang(1–7) was positively correlated with MDA and negatively correlated with SOD. Between-group comparisons demonstrated no differences in serum creatinine (P = 0.706).

Conclusions

RDN attenuated cardiac remodelling and improved heart function by decreasing the level of cardiac oxidative stress and the local activity of the SNS and RAS in cardiac tissues. Additionally, the safety of the RDN procedure was established, as no significant decrease in LVSP or rise in serum creatinine was observed in our study.

Keywords

Renal denervation Acute myocardial infarction Oxidative stress Sympathetic nervous system Renin-angiotensin system

Background

The incidence of acute myocardial infarction (MI) has increased over time. Chronic heart failure (CHF) is a common complication of acute MI, which places substantial burden on the health care system. Complicated pathophysiologic mechanisms participate in the development of HF, among which the whole-body and local cardiac sympathetic nervous system (SNS) and renin-angiotensin system (RAS) contribute significantly to the pathogenesis of CHF. Recently, oxidative stress has been demonstrated to play a pivotal role in ventricular remodelling after MI. In the clinical setting, drugs targeting these two systems, such as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors(ACEI), angiotensin receptor blockers(ARB), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, and beta-blockers, have been the mainstay of management for post-MI HF. Additionally, anti-oxidative therapy has attracted increasing attention in the cardiovascular field. However, despite intensive therapeutic treatment, a large number of patients continue to experience worsening of HF symptoms. Thus, it remains necessary to explore new therapeutic approaches for the treatment of MI and its complications.

Previously published studies have shown that renal denervation (RDN) provides significant benefits in delaying the progression of cardiac hypertrophy [1], attenuating left ventricular (LV) remodelling and improving cardiac function [2]. The activities of the systemic SNS and RAS [3, 4] were shown to be decreased by RDN through interruption of the renal sympathetic efferent and afferent nerves [5]. However, the effects of RDN on cardiac-specific SNS and RAS activity and oxidative stress have not been investigated. In the present study, we used an established canine MI model to explore the related mechanisms, and thus further validate that RDN could be used as a new treatment for post-MI remodelling and HF.

Methods

Animals

Eighteen healthy mongrel dogs (male:female, 8:10), weighing 15 ~ 18 kg, were used in this study (and were provided by the Experimental Animal Centre in Tianjin). The experiments were carried out in strict accordance with the guide for the care and use of laboratory animals. The animals were kept under a 12/12-h light/dark cycle and fed with regular chow and water ad libitum.

Experimental groups and conditions

All experimental mongrel canines were randomly divided into three groups. (1) The control group (n = 6) received only a coronary angiogram, followed by a renal arteriogram one week later. (2) The MI group (n = 6) underwent an established procedure inducing MI and, one week later, underwent a renal arteriogram. (3) The MI + RDN group (n = 6) underwent the MI-inducing procedure, followed by renal denervation one week later.

Myocardial infarction

All animals were anesthetized with 6% sodium pentobarbital (30 mg/kg, intravenous (IV)), with an additional 50 mg given as needed through IV injection every 30 to 60 min, according to the reaction of the animals. The dogs were placed on the operating table in a supine position. Using a Mac-Lab (GE, United States) hemodynamic detection system, electrocardiography (ECG) and vital signs were monitored. The right iliac region was shaved and disinfected, and then a venous pathway was established. The right femoral artery was punctured, and then a 6 F guiding wire was inserted through the sheath, followed by the injection of 1000 IU heparin. After verifying the coronary anatomy, a bolus of gelatine sponge (1 mm in diameter) was injected into the distal end of the fist diagonal branch of the left anterior descending artery, as described previously [6]. Coronary angiography was performed again 10 min later to confirm interruption of the blood flow in the distal vessels. The operation lasted 60–90 min.

Renal denervation

Under pentobarbital sodium (30 mg/kg, IV) anaesthesia, bilateral renal denervation was performed in the MI + RDN group; meanwhile, in the control and MI groups, the operation was the same except that the nerves were kept intact. The right femoral groin was shaved prior to connecting the radio frequency ablation apparatus (IBI-1500 T, IBI, United States). The temperature of the radiofrequency ablation instrument was set at 43 °C, at a power of 10 W, for a duration of 90 s. The right femoral artery was punctured, and a 6 F guiding wire was inserted through the guiding sheath. Renal angiography was performed to determine the location of the renal artery. The ablation electrode (6 F ablation catheter tip, electrode length of 4 mm) was then inserted, and radio frequency (RF) energy was applied to the endothelial lining. The catheter tip was placed in the proximal portion of the renal artery main trunk, and the ablation procedure was conducted by applying RF energy in the renal artery distally to proximally and circumferentially. Then, the catheter was withdrawn 1–2 cm to generate another ablation location. Renal angiography was performed again to validate that the catheter tip was well-attached to the vessel wall before ablating at the new target site. This procedure was repeated three to four times in the renal artery, and then the same RF energy was applied to the contralateral renal artery.

Transthoracic echocardiography

To evaluate LV function and cardiac chamber structure, echocardiography was performed at baseline and 4 weeks after MI (CX50, Philips, Netherlands). Parameters such as the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (LVEDD), left ventricular end-systolic dimension (LVESD) and fraction shortening (FS) were recorded. LVEF was measured using X-plane imaging and was calculated as follows: (LVVmax- LVVmin)/LVVmax. Three consecutive cardiac cycles were observed, and the average values were recorded as the final cardiac parameters.

Detection of haemodynamics

Haemodynamic parameters were detected at baseline and at 4 weeks post-MI. The right femoral artery was punctured, and a 6 F pigtail catheter was used to perform LV angiography. The heart rate (HR), left ventricular systolic pressure (LVSP), and left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) of each animal were measured using the Mac-Lab system.

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)

The myocardial expression of AngII and Ang(1–7) were detected using a commercial ELISA kit (Huamei Biological Co., Wuhan, China). The reaction system and standard curves were established according to the kit’s instructions.

Real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)

We used RT-PCR analysis to assay the mRNA expression of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) and MasR in the LV. Total RNA extraction was performed according to the instructions provided with the Trizol reagent (CWbio. Co. Ltd, Cat# CW0581). Template cDNA was prepared from total RNA using the HiFi-MMLV cDNA reverse transcription kit (CWbio. Co. Ltd, Cat# CW0744). Quantitative PCR (Q-PCR), using an ABI7500 (Applied Biosystems, United States), was performed in triplicate for the amplification of target genes, while GAPDH was selected as an endogenous control. Each sample was run in duplicate with the following thermocycler protocol: an initial step 95 °C for 10 min, followed by 45 cycles at 95 °C for 15 s and 60 °C for 30 s. The PCR mix contained 0.4 uL (10 μmol) of forward and reverse primers, 10 uL of 2× UltraSYBR Mixture (CWbio. Co. Ltd, Cat# CW 0956), 2 uL of template cDNA and RNase-free water to a final volume of 20 uL. Melting curve analysis was used to confirm the specificity and identify of the PCR products, and relative gene expression changes were measured using the delta-delta Ct method, where X = 2-ΔΔCt. The primer sequences used are listed below in Table 1.
Table 1

Specific primers for Q-PCR

Gene names

Primers

Product size (bp)

ACE2

Forward: 5′- TTCAGCACAGTGGATCATCA-3′

95

Reverse: 5′- CAAGTAATAAGCACTCCTGA-3′

MasR

Forward: 5′- TGAGCAACAAGCTGAAGTCC-3′

124

Reverse: 5′- AGGCACCTCCAGTCACACAA-3′

P47phox

Forward: 5′- TGATTGCTGACTACAGCCAC-3′

136

Reverse: 5′- AGGCTCCTCTGGTCCATCAA-3′

GAPDH

Forward: 5′- CGGGCCGTCTTCCCCTCCAT-3′

138

Reverse: 5′- CGGCCAGCCACGTCCAGACG-3′

Immunohistochemistry analysis

Cardiac expression of TH was detected by immunohistochemistry. Myocardial tissues were fixed with formalin, and after embedding and dehydrating, the LV tissue was sliced into 4-um sections. The sections were treated for 10 min with 1% methyl alcohol in H2O2 followed by treatment with 0.01 M citrate buffer (pH 6.0) for 10 min in a microwave oven, and the samples were then washed with PBS after cooling to room temperature. The sections were incubated overnight at 4 °C with primary antibody and again with biotinylated secondary antibody, followed by the addition of streptavidin-conjugated horseradish peroxidase. Immunohistochemistry staining for TH was performed using the DAB staining system according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Then, the nuclei were counterstained with haematoxylin. Three sections from each group were chosen for TH detection, and the amount of TH was assessed in five randomly chosen high-power fields from each sample. The investigator was blinded to the specimen’s source. The raw data were converted to an immunohistochemical score (IHS) to show the immunoreactivity of TH-positive nerves using an image analysis-based system [7].

Statistical analysis

Experimental data were analysed using SPSS version 20.00 software. Quantitative data are presented as the mean ± SD. Group comparisons were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by the Newman-Keuls multiple comparison test to identify significant differences between individual groups. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

One dog died due to a malignant arrhythmia on the 1st day in the MI group, and one dog died on the 3rd day in the MI + RDN group. There were no deaths in the control group.

Baseline parameters

Dogs in each group were assessed for LVEDD, LVESD, FS, LVEF, LVEDP, LVSP and HR before MI (shown in Table 2) and there were no significant baseline differences between the three groups.
Table 2

Baseline data for each group

 

Control group

(n = 6)

MI group

(n = 6)

MI + RDN group

(n = 6)

Weight (kg)

16.00 ± 1.27

16.67 ± 1.51

16.50 ± 1.05

LVEDD (cm)

3.01 ± 0.15

3.15 ± 0.14

3.07 ± 0.17

LVESD (cm)

1.99 ± 0.16

2.11 ± 0.12

2.12 ± 0.13

FS (%)

33.81 ± 3.76

33.12 ± 1.52

31.00 ± 3.37

LVEF (%)

55.80 ± 2.99

58.60 ± 3.72

58.05 ± 3.00

LVEDP (mmHg)

6.17 ± 2.79

5.33 ± 2.07

5.17 ± 1.60

LVSP (mmHg)

124.17 ± 7.06

123.67 ± 12.31

123.33 ± 9.99

HR (bpm)

78.33 ± 10.99

81.33 ± 18.11

76.33 ± 21.95

Baseline data are presented as the mean ± SD with no significant differences between groups (all P > 0.05)

Cardiac function and haemodynamic parameters at 4 weeks post-MI

At 4 weeks post-MI, compared to the control group, dogs from the MI and MI + RDN groups showed increased LVEDD, LVESD and LVEDP, while the LVEF, FS and LVSP values were all reduced. Importantly, compared with the MI group, parameters such as LVEF, LVEDD, LVESD and LVEDP were significantly improved in the MI + RDN group, but no significant difference was observed in FS and LVSP (P = 0.092 and P = 0.931, respectively). Additionally, there were no significant differences in HR among the three groups (shown in Table 3).
Table 3

Data for cardiac function and haemodynamic parameters at 4 weeks post-MI

 

Control group

(n = 6)

MI group

(n = 5)

MI + RDN group

(n = 5)

LVEDD (cm)

2.97 ± 0.15

3.75 ± 0.28*

3.40 ± 0.27*#

LVESD (cm)

1.96 ± 0.15

3.03 ± 0.16*

2.56 ± 0.16*#

FS (%)

34.03 ± 3.59

18.97 ± 6.32*

24.46 ± 4.26*

LVEF (%)

55.37 ± 2.98

37.04 ± 3.05*

41.72 ± 2.91*#

LVEDP (mmHg)

4.67 ± 1.63

16.00 ± 4.69*#

10.60 ± 3.05*#

LVSP (mmHg)

126.33 ± 13.29

104.60 ± 13.97*

103.80 ± 15.59*

HR (bpm)

80.50 ± 11.54

91.80 ± 32.95

74.40 ± 36.28

Values are presented as the mean ± SD

*P < 0.05 vs. control group; # P < 0.05 vs. MI group

Cardiac oxidative stress levels

As shown in Fig. 1, the cardiac infarct border zone was obtained to assess oxidative stress levels. At 4 weeks post-MI, the activities of MDA, p47phox, and ASAFR were all increased compared to the control group, while RDN treatment significantly reduced these changes (shown in Fig. 1a-c). SOD activity in the control, MI, and MI + RDN groups was 159.77 ± 11.90 U/mg prot, 105.14 ± 7.66 U/mg prot and 140.01 ± 14.10 U/mg prot, respectively (shown in Fig. 1d).
Fig. 1

Cardiac oxidative stress levels in each group. a MDA, (b) p47phox subunit, (c) ASAFR, (d) SOD. * P < 0.05 vs. control group;# P < 0.05 vs. MI group

Activity of the cardiac RAS

Compared with the control group, the expression of AngII, ACE2, Ang(1–7) and MasR in myocardial tissue was significantly increased in the MI and MI + RDN groups. After intervention with RDN, the levels of AngII, ACE2, Ang(1–7) and MasR were significantly decreased in the RDN-treated group compared to the MI group (shown in Fig. 2a-d).
Fig. 2

Detection of cardiac RAS activity. a AngII, (b) ACE2, (c) Ang(1–7), (d) MasR. The levels of AngII and Ang(1–7) were measured by ELISA. The mRNA levels of ACE2 and MasR were detected through RT-PCR, and GAPDH was used as an internal control. * P < 0.05 vs. control group; # P < 0.05 vs. MI group

Activity of the cardiac SNS

Four weeks post-MI, the relative expression of TH-positive nerves in the myocardial tissue from the control, MI and MI + RDN groups was 66.82 ± 13.09, 134.16 ± 12.06, and 101.14 ± 3.91, respectively. Compared with the control group, the amount of TH-positive nerves was markedly elevated in the MI and MI + RDN groups. Importantly, a decrease in TH-positive nerves was seen in the MI + RDN group compared with the MI group (shown in Fig. 3a-b).
Fig. 3

a TH immunohistochemical staining at the infarct border zone of nerve fibres (×400). Compared with the control group, the TH nerve fibres in the MI and MI + RDN groups were increased. However, after treatment with RDN, the quantity of TH nerve fibres was significantly decreased, and an orderly appearance of fibres was observed. b Expression of TH-positive nerves in cardiac tissues. * P < 0.05 vs. control group;# P < 0.05 vs. MI group

Correlation analysis

The expression of TH, AngII and Ang(1–7) was positively correlated with MDA (all P < 0.05) and negatively correlated with SOD (all P < 0.05). The correlation indexes are listed in Table 4.
Table 4

Correlation analysis

 

TH (IHS)

AngII (pg/mL)

Ang(1–7) (pg/mL)

MDA (nmol/mg prot)

0.900

0.876

0.832

SOD (nmol/mg prot)

−0.818

−0.674

−0.806

TH-positive nerves in renal tissue

Four weeks after MI, the relative expression of TH-positive nerves in renal tissue in the control, MI and MI + RDN groups was 93.44 ± 10.86, 102.26 ± 18.98, 75.69 ± 14.67, respectively. A decrease in TH-positive nerves was seen in the MI + RDN group compared to the MI group, while no significant difference (P = 0.071) was observed between the control and MI + RDN groups (shown in Fig. 4a-b).
Fig. 4

a TH immunohistochemical staining of nerve fibres in renal tissue (×400). Compared with the MI group, the density of TH nerve fibres was decreased in the MI + RDN group; no difference was observed between the control and MI + RDN groups. b Expression of TH-positive nerves in renal tissues. # P < 0.05 vs. MI group

Comparison of serum creatinine at 4 weeks post-MI in each group

The serum creatinine levels in the control, MI and MI + RDN groups were 56.00 ± 19.12 μmol/L, 62.20 ± 12.79 μmol/L and 64.80 ± 20.40 μmol/L, respectively. No difference in serum creatinine among the three groups was detected (P = 0.706, shown in Fig. 5).
Fig. 5

Serum creatinine levels at 4 weeks post-MI in each group. No differences were observed in serum creatinine among the three groups

Discussion

Mounting evidence suggests that RDN is beneficial at improving cardiac function in both experimental animals and clinical patients. Hu et al. found that RDN was superior to monotherapy with a beta blocker, ACEI or ARB in decreasing plasma norepinephrine (NE) levels and improving cardiac function in rats with MI [8]. A significant improvement in diastolic function and a lowered LV mass index were also seen in RDN-treated refractory hypertension patients [9]. The present study showed that cardiac function was deteriorated after MI and that RDN inhibited the process of ventricular remodelling and improved cardiac function. Acute MI results in an increase in SNS and RAS activity in both the whole body and local myocardial tissues, which is proportional to the severity of post-MI HF [10, 11]. Additionally, reactive oxygen species (ROS), as the main effectors of oxidative stress, play an important role in the ventricular remodelling that occurs after MI [12]. Many studies have shown that RDN is effective at reducing the whole-body activity of the SNS and RAS. In our study, we explored the effect of RDN on cardiac oxidative stress and local activity of the SNS and RAS.

Previous studies have demonstrated that antioxidant therapy distinctly inhibits oxidative stress, delays ventricular remodelling and improves cardiac function after MI [13, 14]. Oxidative stress results from imbalance of the antioxidant and oxidant systems, which leads to excessive ROS production. The biological effects of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) oxidase, one of the principle sources of ROS in the cardiovascular system [15], are regulated by antioxidant enzymes such as SOD and catalase. The NADPH p47phoxsubunit, composed of 390 amino acids, acts as a connector between the components of the membrane and cytoplasm and is essential for NADPH oxidase activation [16] and interstitial fibrosis [17]. MDA, the lipid peroxidate product, is used as a measure of the body’s oxidative levels. SOD is a vital antioxidant enzyme and effectively clears free oxygen radicals. In our study, we found that RDN reduced the high level of oxidative stress after MI. In addition, the activity of ASAFR in dogs from the MI + RDN group was lower than in those from the MI group. Regarding this phenomenon, we propose that RDN reduces the myocardial oxidative level mainly through decreasing the generation of superoxide rather than increasing the activity of ASAFR, which clears superoxide production.

It is well known that chronic sustained sympathetic over-activity results in the aggravation and deterioration of HF. Previously published studies have shown that RDN can reduce HR, NE overflow and muscle SNS activity [1820]; meanwhile, RDN has also demonstrated beneficial effects in various conditions with high SNS activity, such as resistant hypertension, HF, malignant arrhythmia, impaired glucose tolerance and chronic renal dysfunction [1, 2123]. Research has further demonstrated that TH-positive nerves can be used as an indirect indicator of sympathetic activity [24]. In our research, the effectiveness of removing sympathetic nerve activity by RDN was demonstrated by the decrease in TH-positive fibres in renal tissues. Moreover, the relative expression of TH nerve fibres, which reflects the local activity of the SNS, was also down-regulated in cardiac tissue, suggesting that RDN lowered the over-activation of the SNS in myocardial tissues.

The RAS is also a crucial mediator of myocardial fibrosis, pathological hypertrophy and HF [25, 26]. The adverse effects of the RAS on cardiovascular disease are mainly due to increased AngII, which exerts its effects through the classical ACE-AngII-AT1R axis. Importantly, the ACE2-Ang(1–7)-MasR axis, known as an endogenous counter-regulator of the RAS, has been confirmed to be protective in CHF [27]. The development of cardiovascular disease has been found to involve to both axes of the RAS [28]. ACE2’s major biological function is converting AngII into Ang(1–7), which is the physiological antagonist of AngII [2931]. Ang(1–7) exerts vasodilatory, anti-proliferative, anti-inflammatory, and protective effects through activation of MasR. Previous studies have shown that ACE2 is increased in MI or HF [3235]. As reported previously, the ACE2 gene was upregulated in HF patients and was associated with the degree of LVEDD and LVEF loss [36]. In agreement with previous investigations, our study showed that AngII and the compensatory ACE2-Ang(1–7)-MasR axis were increased in MI dogs, although these changes were reversed by ablation of renal sympathetic nerves. The exact mechanisms for the decreased expression of ACE2-Ang(1–7)-MasR after RDN are not fully understood; we speculate that RDN effectively inhibits LV dilatation and modifies cardiac function by reducing the activation of AngII to a significantly higher degree, which in turn leads to a relatively weakened compensatory mechanism. Importantly, a previous study reported that the enhanced ACE2 and Ang(1–7) levels were significantly reduced after treatment with Telmisartan in rats with HF [32], which is consistent with our results.

Cardiac SNS, RAS and oxidative stress mutually influence each other. AngII-induced phosphorylation of p47phox [16] and myocardial hypertrophy induced by ROS mediate various signalling pathways [37]. Moreover, the AngII type 1 receptor (AT1R) blocker irbesartan and Ang(1–7) blocked NADPH oxidase activation and thus restored systolic function and carotid flow in an animal study [38, 39]. Other studies have shown that ROS increase SNS activity both in the central and peripheral nervous systems [40]. In our study, we found that RDN lowered the expression of AngII, MDA and TH-positive nerve fibres in the heart, and the change in MDA was positively correlated with AngII and TH. Our preliminarily hypothesis is that RDN improves cardiac function by reducing the activity of the cardiac AngII-ROS-SNS axis, which needs to be confirmed in future research.

Safety issues related to the procedure for RDN have attracted great attention. The REACH Pilot study evaluated the safety of RDN for HF, and no significant reduction in blood pressure or other haemodynamic disturbances were observed [1]. Mahfound et al. found that RDN reduced the renal resistance index without decreasing the glomerular filtration rate (GFR), and no renal artery stenosis or dissection was recorded [41]. Hering et al. demonstrated that RDN had no negative influence on patients with renal insufficiency [23]. In the present study, the LVSP and serum creatinine level showed no significant difference after RDN compared with the non-RDN treated group, thereby demonstrating the short-term safety of the RDN procedure.

Conclusion

RDN exerts a protective effect against acute MI, which may be attributed to antioxidant effects and a decrease in the local activity of the SNS and RAS. In conclusion, RDN may serve as a new therapeutic treatment for MI patients by blocking these adverse mechanisms.

Limitations

With regard to our study, some limitations should be considered. First, myocardial infarction was only validated by the pathological specimen and echocardiography, and we did not evaluate the infarct size, which reduces the persuasion to a certain extent. Second, the number of subjects was not large enough, which may have affected our statistical analysis. Third, due to lack of a control + RDN group, the effects of the intervention could not be excluded completely. Finally, the observation time was short. To confirm the validity of these results, studies both in humans and animals should be undertaken on a larger scale and with a longer observation time.

Abbreviations

ACE2: 

Angiotensin converting enzyme 2

ACEI: 

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors

AMI: 

Acute myocardial infarction

Ang(1–7): 

Angiotensin 1 through 7

AngII: 

AngiotensinII

ARB: 

Angiotensin receptor blockers

ASAFR: 

Anti-superoxide anion free radical

AT1R: 

AngII type 1 receptor

CHF: 

Chronic heart failure

ELISA: 

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

FS: 

Fraction shortening

GFR: 

Glomerular filtration rate

HR: 

Heart rate

IHS: 

Immunohistochemical score

LVEDD: 

Left ventricular end-diastolic dimension

LVEDP: 

Left ventricular end-diastolic pressure

LVEF: 

Left ventricular ejection fraction

LVESD: 

Left ventricular end-systolic dimension

LVSP: 

Left ventricular systolic pressure

MasR: 

Mas receptor

MDA: 

Malondialdehyde

NADPH: 

Adenine dinucleotide phosphate

NE: 

Norepinephrine

Q-PCR: 

Quantitative PCR

RAS: 

Renin-angiotensin system

RDN: 

Renal sympathetic denervation

RF: 

Radio frequency

RT-PCR: 

Real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction

SNS: 

Sympathetic nervous system

SOD: 

Superoxide dismutase

TH: 

Tyrosine hydroxylase

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank all the researchers who participated in this work.

Funding

This work was supported by the research plan of the Tianjin Application Foundation and Advanced Technology (NO.14JCYBJC26100) and the Science and Technology foundation of Tianjin Health and Family Planning Committee (NO.15KG131 and NO.2014KY11).

Availability of data and materials

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated during the current study.

Authors’ contributions

Study design and model building: CL, LS and CL. Data collection: LS and LW. Data analysis: QF and RU. Manuscript writing: QF and CL. Final approval of the manuscript: CL. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval

All experimental protocols were approved by the local animal care and use committee (the Animal Experimental Ethics Association of Tianjin First Centre Hospital). The methods were carried out in accordance with the approved guidelines.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
First Center Clinic College of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin First Central Hospital
(2)
Department of Cardiology, Tianjin First Central Hospital
(3)
Department of Digestion, Tianjin First Central Hospital

References

  1. Davies JE, Manisty CH, Petraco R, Barron AJ, Unsworth B, Mayet J, et al. First-in-man safety evaluation of renal denervation for chronic systolic heart failure: primary outcome from REACH-Pilot study. Int J Cardiol. 2013;162:189–92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Tan LH, Li XG, Guo YZ, Tang XH, Yang K, Jiang WH. Effect of renal sympathetic denervation on left ventricular hypertrophy and inflammatory factors in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Zhejiang da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2013;42:550–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Xie Y, Liu Q, Xu Y, Gao J, Yan P, Zhang W, et al. Effect of catheter-based renal sympathetic denervation in pigs with rapid pacing induced heart failure. Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2014;42:48–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Schlaich MP, Sobotka PA, Krum H, Lambert E, Esler MD. Renal sympathetic-nerve ablation for uncontrolled hypertension. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:932–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Dibona GF, Kopp UC. Neural control of renal function. Physiol Rev. 1997;77:75–197.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Wen XF, Li RF, Bu LH, Yang P, Sha F, Wang D, et al. Establishing a canine model of precise acute myocardial infarction by interventional occlusion with gelatin sponge via femoral artery. Progress Mod Biomed. 2010;10:3601–5.Google Scholar
  7. Soslow RA, Dannenberg AJ, Rush D, Woerner BM, Khan KN, Masferrer J, et al. Cox-2 is expressed in human pulmonary, colonic, and mammary tumors. Cancer. 2000;89:2637–45.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Hu J, Li Y, Cheng W, Yang Z, Wang F, Lv P, et al. A comparison of the efficacy of surgical renal denervation and pharmacologic therapies in post-myocardial infarction heart failure. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e96996.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Mahfoud F, Urban D, Teller D, Linz D, Stawowy P, Hassel JH, et al. Effect of renal denervation on left ventricular mass and function in patients with resistant hypertension: data from a multi-centre cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging trial. Eur Heart J. 2014;35:2224–2231b.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Dostal DE, Baker KM. The cardiac renin–angiotensin system: conceptual, or a regulator of cardiac function? Circ Res. 1999;85:643–50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Watson AM, Hood SG, May CN. Mechanisms of sympathetic activation in heart failure. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2006;33:1269–74.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Hill MF, Singal PK. Antioxidant and oxidative stress changes during heart failure subsequent to myocardial infarction in rats. Am J Pathol. 1996;148:291–300.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Kinugawa S, Tsutsui H, Hayashidani S, Ide T, Suematsu N, Satoh S, et al. Treatment with dimethylthiourea prevents left ventricular remodeling and failure after experimental myocardial infarction in mice: role of oxidative stress. Circ Res. 2000;87:392–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Sia YT, Lapointe N, Parker TG, Tsoporis JN, Deschepper CF, Calderone A, et al. Beneficial effects of long-term use of the antioxidant probucol in heart failure in the rat. Circulation. 2002;105:2549–55.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Heymes C, Bendall JK, Ratajczak P, Cave AC, Samuel JL, Hasenfuss G, et al. Increased myocardial NADPH oxidase activity in human heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;41:2164–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Kleniewska P, Piechota A, Skibska B, Gorąca A. The NADPH oxidase family and its inhibitors. Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz). 2012;60:277–94.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Doerries C, Grote K, Hilfiker-Kleiner D, Luchtefeld M, Schaefer A, Holland SM, et al. Critical role of the NAD(P)H oxidase subunit p47phox for left ventricular remodeling/dysfunction and survival after myocardial infarction. Circ Res. 2007;100:894–903.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Ukena C, Mahfoud F, Spies A, Kindermann I, Linz D, Cremers B, et al. Effects of renal sympathetic denervation on heart rate and atrioventricular conduction in patients with resistant hypertension. Int J Cardiol. 2013;167:2846–51.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Krum H, Schlaich M, Whitbourn R, Sobotka PA, Sadowski J, Bartus K, et al. Catheter-based renal sympathetic denervation for resistant hypertension: a multicentre safety and proof-of-principle cohort study. Lancet. 2009;373:1275–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Hering D, Marusic P, Walton AS, Lambert EA, Krum H, Narkiewicz K, et al. Sustained sympathetic and blood pressure reduction 1 year after renal denervation in patients with resistant hypertension. Hypertension. 2014;64:118–24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Armaganijan LV, Staico R, Moreira DA, Lopes RD, Medeiros PT, Habib R, et al. 6-month outcomes in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators undergoing renal sympathetic denervation for the treatment of refractory ventricular arrhythmias. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8:984–90.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Mahfoud F, Schlaich M, Kindermann I, Ukena C, Cremers B, Brandt MC, et al. Effect of renal sympathetic denervation on glucose metabolism in patients with resistant hypertension: a pilot study. Circulation. 2011;123:1940–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Hering D, Mahfoud F, Walton AS, Krum H, Lambert GW, Lambert EA, et al. Renal denervation in moderate to severe CKD. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012;23:1250–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Burgi K, Cavalleri MT, Alves AS, Britto LR, Antunes VR, Michelini LC. Tyrosine hydroxylase immunoreactivity as indicator of sympathetic activity: simultaneous evaluation in different tissues of hypertensive rats. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2011;300:R264–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Mehta PK, Griendling KK. Angiotensin II cell signaling: physiological and pathological effects in the cardiovascular system. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2007;292:C82–97.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Weber KT, Brilla CG. Pathological hypertrophy and cardiac interstitium. Fibrosis and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. Circulation. 1991;83:1849–65.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Crackower MA, Sarao R, Oudit GY, Yagil C, Kozieradzki I, Scanga SE, et al. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 is an essential regulator of heart function. Nature. 2002;417:822–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Zucker IH, Xiao L, Haack KK. The central renin-angiotensin system and sympathetic nerve activity in chronic heart failure. Clin Sci. 2014;126:695–706.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Garabelli PJ, Modrall JG, Penninger JM, Ferrario CM, Chappell MC. Distinct roles for angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 and carboxypeptidase A in the processing of angiotensins within the murine heart. Exp Physiol. 2008;93:613–21.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Mendoza-Torres E, Oyarzún A, Mondaca-Ruff D, Azocar A, Castro PF, Jalil JE, et al. ACE2 and vasoactive peptides: novel players in cardiovascular/renal remodeling and hypertension. Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis. 2015;9:217–37.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Hao PP, Yang JM, Zhang MX, Zhang K, Chen YG, Zhang C, et al. Angiotensin-(1–7) treatment mitigates right ventricular fibrosis as a distinctive feature of diabetic cardiomyopathy. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2015;308:H1007–19.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Liang B, Li Y, Han Z, Xue J, Zhang Y, Jia S, et al. ACE2-Ang (1–7) axis is induced in pressure overloaded rat model. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2015;8:1443–50.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Ortiz-Pérez JT, Riera M, Bosch X, De Caralt TM, Perea RJ, Pascual J, et al. Role of circulating angiotensin converting enzyme 2 in left ventricular remodeling following myocardial infarction: a prospective controlled study. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e61695.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Wang J, Li N, Gao F, Song R, Zhu S, Geng Z. Balance between angiotensin converting enzyme and angiotensin converting enzyme 2 in patients with chronic heart failure. J Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone Syst. 2015;16:553–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Cohen-Segev R, Francis B, Abu-Saleh N, Awad H, Lazarovich A, Kabala A, et al. Cardiac and renal distribution of ACE and ACE-2 in rats with heart failure. Acta Histochem. 2014;116:1342–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Ohtsuki M, Morimoto S, Izawa H, Ismail TF, Ishibashi-Ueda H, Kato Y, et al. Angiotensin converting enzyme 2 gene expression increased compensatory for left ventricular remodeling in patients with end-stage heart failure. Int J Cardiol. 2010;145:333–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Gul R, Shawl AI, Kim SH, Kim UH. Cooperative interaction between reactive oxygen species and Ca2+ signals contributes to angiotensin II-induced hypertrophy in adult rat cardiomyocytes. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2012;302:H901–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Patel VB, Bodiga S, Fan D, Das SK, Wang Z, Wang W, et al. Cardioprotective effects mediated by angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockade and enhancing angiotensin 1–7 in experimental heart failure in angiotensin-converting enzyme 2-null mice. Hypertension. 2012;59:1195–203.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Pernomian L, Gomes MS, Restini CB, de Oliveira AM. MAS-mediated antioxidant effects restore the functionality of angiotensin converting enzyme 2-angiotensin-(1–7)-MAS axis in diabetic rat carotid. BioMed Res Int. 2014;2014:640329.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Campese VM, Ye S, Zhong H, Yanamadala V, Ye Z, Chiu J. Reactive oxygen species stimulate central and peripheral sympathetic nervous system activity. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2004;287:H695–703.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Mahfoud F, Cremers B, Janker J, Link B, Vonend O, Ukena C, et al. Renal hemodynamics and renal function after catheter-based renal sympathetic denervation in patients with resistant hypertension. Hypertension. 2012;60:419–24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement