Medical concepts related to individual risk are better explained with "plausibility" rather than "probability"
© Grossi; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2005
Received: 29 April 2005
Accepted: 27 September 2005
Published: 27 September 2005
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|29 Apr 2005||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|4 Jul 2005||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Maysam Abbod|
|18 Aug 2005||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Cathy Helgason|
|22 Aug 2005||Author responded||Author comments - Enzo Grossi|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|22 Aug 2005||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|21 Sep 2005||Author responded||Author comments - Enzo Grossi|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|21 Sep 2005||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|27 Sep 2005||Editorially accepted|
|27 Sep 2005||Article published||10.1186/1471-2261-5-31|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.