Skip to main content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

A comparison of the illness beliefs of people with angina and their peers: a questionnaire study

  • Gill Furze1Email author,
  • Alun Roebuck1,
  • Peter Bull2,
  • Robert JP Lewin1 and
  • David R Thompson1
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders20022:4

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2261-2-4

Received: 30 November 2001

Accepted: 20 February 2002

Published: 20 February 2002

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
30 Nov 2001 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
27 Dec 2001 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Keith Petrie
17 Feb 2002 Author responded Author comments - Gill Furze
Resubmission - Version 3
17 Feb 2002 Submitted Manuscript version 3
20 Feb 2002 Editorially accepted
20 Feb 2002 Article published 10.1186/1471-2261-2-4

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

British Heart Foundation Rehabilitation Research Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York
Department of Psychology, University of York