Skip to main content
Download PDF

The silent and apparent neurological injury in transcatheter aortic valve implantation study (SANITY): concept, design and rationale

BMC Cardiovascular Disorders volume 14, Article number: 45 (2014) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The incidence of clinically apparent stroke in transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) exceeds that of any other procedure performed by interventional cardiologists and, in the index admission, occurs more than twice as frequently with TAVI than with surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). However, this represents only a small component of the vast burden of neurological injury that occurs during TAVI, with recent evidence suggesting that many strokes are clinically silent or only subtly apparent. Additionally, insult may manifest as slight neurocognitive dysfunction rather than overt neurological deficits. Characterisation of the incidence and underlying aetiology of these neurological events may lead to identification of currently unrecognised neuroprotective strategies.

Methods

The Silent and Apparent Neurological Injury in TAVI (SANITY) Study is a prospective, multicentre, observational study comparing the incidence of neurological injury after TAVI versus SAVR. It introduces an intensive, standardised, formal neurologic and neurocognitive disease assessment for all aortic valve recipients, regardless of intervention (SAVR, TAVI), valve-type (bioprosthetic, Edwards SAPIEN-XT) or access route (sternotomy, transfemoral, transapical or transaortic). Comprehensive monitoring of neurological insult will also be recorded to more fully define and compare the neurological burden of the procedures and identify targets for harm minimisation strategies.

Discussion

The SANITY study undertakes the most rigorous assessment of neurological injury reported in the literature to date. It attempts to accurately characterise the insult and sustained injury associated with both TAVI and SAVR in an attempt to advance understanding of this complication and associations thus allowing for improved patient selection and procedural modification.

Peer Review reports

Background

Emerging data now supports transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) as an acceptable strategy in the management of severe aortic stenosis (AS) amongst patients deemed ineligible or too high-risk for SAVR. Despite the technique’s success, the risk of neurological insult and injury associated with TAVI has raised concerns [1]. This may take the form of either cerebrovascular events (CVEs) – including major/disabling stroke, minor/non-disabling stroke, transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) or silent brain infarcts; or neurocognitive dysfunction - especially post-operative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) and post-operative delirium (POD). Such events may be overt, subtle, or clinically silent (Figure 1). While overt stroke rates have been reported in most safety and efficacy studies/registries, subtle and silent neurological events have been unreliably detected due to limitations of assessment tools and prevailing clinical approaches. Additionally, although emboli are thought to be the major cause especially of early neurological injury the underlying insults behind both types of injury remain poorly characterised.

Figure 1
figure 1

Schema of neurological injury in TAVI.

Full size image

Clinically apparent cerebrovascular events

Strokes/TIAs (as defined in Table 1) are more common post-TAVI than after alternative management strategies, with the highest reported incidence for any cardiac procedure [2]. Thirty-day stroke rates of 3.3%, 2.4% and 1–2% have been reported for populations undergoing TAVI, isolated SAVR, and balloon valvuloplasty, respectively [3–5]. For all three interventions, this risk is highest within the first 24 hours, suggesting an early hazard phase immediately post-procedure [6, 7]. This early hazard phase is considered 'procedurally-related’ and represents the period during which TAVI recipients are at increased risk. Improved understanding of events during this period therefore promises the greatest potential for optimisation of TAVI and as such is the focus of the SANITY Study.

Table 1 Classification and definitions of neurological injury/impairment
Full size table

Silent brain infarction

In neuroimaging studies, clinically apparent strokes account for only a minority of CVEs. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) studies have revealed the average incidence of new ischemic lesions as 75% post-TAVI, and as high as 93% [8, 9]. Comparatively, only 40–50% are evident on DWI studies following SAVR, and 22% following retrograde catheterisation of the aortic valve in AS [8, 10]. Understanding of these clinically silent CVEs is more limited than for clinically apparent strokes, with only a few published MRI-centred studies investigating their occurrence post-TAVI, amounting to fewer than 200 patients. The clinical relevance of this burden of infarct remains unknown, though has been suggested to correlate with increased risk of post-operative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) or post-operative delirium (POD) [11, 12]. Furthermore, DWI has recently been recommended as a useful surrogate endpoint for quantifying neurological injury due to the relative rarity of clinically apparent neurological injury [13].

Neurocognitive impairment

Investigation into neurological injury post-TAVI has almost exclusively focused on CVEs, with little attention given to neurocognitive/neuropsychological disturbances. This reflects both the common occurrence and uncertain consequences of such events and the difficulties of their clinical detection. Two entities of particular interest are POD and POCD, which are outlined in Table 1. Though clinical experience suggests that these are common entities post-cardiovascular intervention, studies geared towards their detection following TAVI are sparse.

Neurological insult

The underlying neurological insult resulting in injury is thought to be primarily an embolic phenomenon [2]. Transcranial Doppler (TCD) studies have demonstrated microemboli at all stages of the TAVI procedure, with cumulative embolic loads exceeding 500 high-intensity signals (HITS, a validated surrogate of emboli) reported, especially during stages of aortic valve manipulation/TAVI deployment. A recent study employing embolic protection devices has demonstrated that a large number of such emboli are particulate in nature and include acute and chronic thrombus, atheromatous, calcific and valve/vascular tissue [14].

In addition to emboli, cerebral hypoperfusion is also likely a significant contributory factor, both in precipitating ischemia and magnifying the effects of microemboli [15]. Indeed, a pilot study employing cerebral oximetry has confirmed statistically significant reductions in cerebral oxygen saturations most notably during periods of rapid ventricular pacing during valvuloplasty and valve deployment [16].

Generally, the data used to quantify and characterise the aetiology of the neurological insult is based on a limited number of small studies. Furthermore, no studies to date have correlated neurological insult detected by intraoperative monitoring and MRI evidence of neurological injury within the same cohort of patients.

Area of need

Clearly, current understanding of the nature and character of both the neurologic injury and the underlying insult associated with TAVI is incomplete. The paucity of data is the consequence of studies not specifically geared towards sensitive neurological insult/injury detection and the significant functional benefits of TAVI in patients who are ineligible or at high-risk for SAVR. However, the nature of neurological injury becomes of increasing interest as refinement of TAVI continues with the expectation that complications can and should be minimised. Indeed, the greatest barrier to TAVI extending into lower surgical risk and younger populations remain the risk of neurological injury.

Objectives

The SANITY study (ACTRN12613000083796) aims to provide the most comprehensive characterisation to date of neurological insult and injury - both clinically apparent and silent – post-TAVI and SAVR. These encompass pre-existing patient factors, and both intra- and post-operative factors thought to influence neurological insult and injury during aortic valve interventions. It is hoped that improved understanding of these associations will permit detailed characterisation of neurological injury during TAVI compared to the gold-standard management of SAVR, and allow for the identification of predictors of such injury and previously unrecognised neuroprotective strategies.

Specifically, the objectives are:

Primary Objectives: Characterise neurological injury (MRI evidence of new ischaemic lesions) during the TAVI procedure compared with SAVR

Secondary Objectives:

  1. 1.

    Define the association between incidence of neurological insult (intraprocedural monitoring) and injury with:

    • Procedure (TAVI, SAVR)

    • TAVI access (transfemoral, transapical, transaortic)

  2. 2.

    Define the association between incidence of neurological insult, radiological evidence of injury and:

    • Clinically apparent neurological injury

    • New onset atrial fibrillation

    • Neurocognitive dysfunction

    • Degree of vascular/aortic valve calcification

    • Rapid ventricular pacing and cerebral desaturation

    • Serological markers of neurological injury (S100B and GFAP)

  3. 3.

    Validate GFAP as a serological marker of neurological injury in cardiovascular intervention

Hypotheses

Based on the current concept of neurological insult and extrapolation of procedural risk factors for embolisation, it is hypothesised that neurological injury is less pronounced with:

  1. 1.

    SAVR than TAVI, due to the removal of the valvular source of embolisation, which in TAVI persists, pushed against the wall of the aorta and potentially acting as a nidus for calcific emboli and altered rheology, promoting thrombosis.

  2. 2.

    A transapical/transaortic than transfemoral approach. Transapical/transaortic routes minimise the risk of disrupting calcific plaques especially in the aortic arch, an inherent risk with femoral access.

Methods

Study design

This is a prospective, multicentre, non-randomised and observational study comparing the incidence of neurological injury associated with TAVI of the Edwards SAPIEN-XT (Edwards LifeSciences Irvine, CA, USA) under general anaesthetic versus bioprosthetic SAVR. Ethics approval has been obtained from the Human Research Ethics Committee of the Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Australia (HREC/12/QPCH/291) and informed consent will be obtained from all participants prior to enrolment.

Regularly held 'Heart Team’ meetings - comprising of multiple disciplines including echocardiologists, interventional cardiologists, nurses and cardiothoracic surgeons – will assess high-risk patients with severe AS. Here, patients will be allocated to the intervention clinically indicated. Pending informed consent, such patients will be consecutively recruited into the SANITY study, resulting in cohort grouping as outlined in Figure 2.

Figure 2
figure 2

SANITY study design.

Full size image

Patient population

Thorough pre-, intra- and post-procedural assessments allow results to be adjusted for baseline status, thus permitting an inclusive approach to enrolment. As such, only patients unable to participate in aspects of assessment or enrolled in other studies (Table 2) will be excluded.

Table 2 Eligibility criteria
Full size table

Data collection

The complete assessment regime and timing of each component can be found in Figure 3. Where relevant, this regime was designed to be consistent with the assessments and endpoints recommended by the Valve Academic Research Consortium updated standardised endpoints (VARC-2) [17]. A multi-disciplinary approach has been adopted to ensure that relevant experts address each assessment domain.

Figure 3
figure 3

Overview of SANITY assessments.

Full size image

Medical/medication history

Qualified medical or nursing personnel will administer a detailed, standardised questionnaire, either at the time of consent or, in cases of telephone consent, at first subsequent contact. This is aimed at identifying all pre-existing cerebrovascular and neurocognitive risk factors and assigning formal surgical-risk scores using the Society for Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality (STS-PROM) scale and European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE) II. At each contact specific questioning and chart review will target transient ischemic events that might otherwise be missed using the neurological assessment protocol outlined below.

Neurological and cognitive assessment

There are no standards or recommendations guiding neurocognitive assessment in the TAVI population. Cognitive function will primarily be assessed with application of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). This tool is generally considered more sensitive for vascular cognitive impairment than the mini-mental state examination (MMSE) due to the inclusion of a thorough executive function assessment [18]. Additionally, as appropriate, the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) or the intensive care unit (ICU) equivalent – CAM-ICU, will be performed for the detection of delirium [19]. These tests will be administered prior to the index procedure and at day 3, 6 weeks and 6 months post-index procedure.

Clinical neurological assessment

The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) is a widely validated tool, which facilitates the standardised objective quantification of impairment caused by stroke. Categorisation of stroke severity (no stroke, minor stroke, moderate stroke, moderate to severe stroke and severe stroke) is permitted, based on the overall score. Where stroke is identified (pre-existing or new), the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) will be applied to measure and monitor stroke-related disability. These assessments will be applied at the same time points as outlined for the cognitive assessment tools.

Serological assessments

Numerous serological markers of neurological injury have been utilised previously in acute ischemic stroke (AIS), however few studies have evaluated their application specifically in patients undergoing cardiovascular interventions; thus, the ideal marker in this setting is unknown [20]. Following careful consideration of strengths and weaknesses of each (Additional file 1: Table S1), GFAP and S100B were selected for use in the SANITY study. The time points for testing will be pre-procedure and daily for four days post-procedure.

Imaging assessments

Echocardiography

Echocardiography (either transoesophageal or transthoracic) will be performed on all patients prior to and following the aortic valve procedure for the purposes of grading aortic stenosis and valve function. The TAVI Echocardiographic Calcification Score (TAVI-ECS) will be applied [21]. Additionally, assessment for intra-cardiac thrombi and spontaneous echo contrast will be sought to aid assessment of pre-existing procoagulant state [22].

Carotid duplex ultrasound

It is feasible that carotid artery stenosis (CAS) may play a role, albeit currently undefined, in post-operative stroke [23]. As such, carotid duplex ultrasound will be performed on all patients at baseline to identify CAS within the common, internal and external carotid arteries. Stenosis and plaque burden will be graded, taking into consideration all information from B-mode, pulsed-wave and colour-flow Doppler.

CT Chest/vascular calcification score

Arterial calcification correlates with atherosclerotic plaque burden [24]. The Agaston Score Equivalent (ASE) is a widely used method of measuring the calcified plaque burden in coronary arteries using non contrast CT [25]. Thus, a low dose, non-contrast acquisition will form part of the CT angiographic assessment of the aorta and the iliofemoral access arteries as routinely performed for TAVI suitability assessment and planning. These images will be loaded into Syngo.Via (Siemens Healthcare, Munich, Germany) and Calcium Score/ ASEs of the aorta will be quantitatively calculated for each of the aortic vessel segments, including the aortic root and valve leaflets. The correlation between the vascular and aortic valve plaque burden and neurological insult can thus be determined.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)

Recognised as the most sensitive technique for the detection of acute ischemic cerebral infarcts, DWI detects the restriction of water diffusion in cerebral tissue caused by hypoxic oedema within minutes of ischemia onset. Increased signal intensity on DWI is reliably Detectable 4 hours post-insult and persists for up to 10 days [26]. Lesions representing brain infarct can be quantified in number, size, and volume using this modality.

Susceptibility Weighted Imaging (SWI) is a relatively new MRI sequence which is highly sensitive to the local magnetic field inhomogeneity caused by paramagnetic substances including the haem group in haemoglobin. SWI is commonly used as an adjunct to DWI in the assessment of cerebral ischemia as it is extremely sensitive for detecting haemorrhagic transformation within regions of infarction; can demonstrate acute thromboemboli sufficient to occlude arteries and can detect micro-haemorrhage, suspected to originate from diapedesis of red blood cells across overtly permeable capillaries. Peak incidence of haemorrhagic transformation occurs between 48 hours and 5 days and can persist for years [27].

Patients will undergo a baseline MRI study <48 hours prior to intervention. This comprehensive study will include standard fast spin echo sequences, baseline DWI and SWI sequences and time of flight angiography of the circle of Willis to document pre-existing disease. At day 4 (±2) post-intervention, and following removal of temporary pacing wires where applicable, a limited study consisting of DWI, SWI, T2 Flair and T1-weighted imaging will be performed. This interval length allows for sufficient patient recovery post-procedure to safely undergo an MRI examination and allows for establishment of the MRI detectable changes and maximum evolution of the ischemic change [28]. This limited acquisition is performed in 15 min for increased patient tolerance. A further limited examination after 6 months will include DWI and SWI, demonstrating DWI resolution, infarct complications and finally accounting for all SWI lesions.

Monitoring

Near infrared spectroscopic (NIRS)Cerebral Oximetry

Transcranial cerebral oximetry non-invasively monitors cerebral oxygen saturation (rSO2) in the frontal lobes of the brain and has been shown to correlate with cerebral venous oxygen saturation, which is traditionally considered the 'gold-standard’ for determining oxygen delivery/consumption [29]. Accepted thresholds for cerebral ischemia are a rSO2 of <50% or a decline of >20% [30]. This will be applied during the intra-operative period of the SANITY study with use of INVOS™ (Covidien, Boulder, CO) specifically to monitor the cerebral oxygen delivery compromise associated with the procedure, and in particular with rapid ventricular pacing [31, 32].

Invasive blood pressure

Hemodynamic instability leading to systemic hypotension may impair cerebral perfusion pressure beyond auto-regulatory capacity, resulting in hypoperfusion [33]. While itself a cause of ischemia, low cerebral flow magnifies the effects of micro-emboli by impairing their clearance and permitting small emboli to lodge.

Telemetry

Intra-operative telemetry will be employed to measure the number and duration of rapid ventricular pacing episodes and to detect intra-operative rhythm abnormalities.

Quality of life

Quality of life (QoL) assessment during post-procedural follow-up is crucial to determining the clinical benefit of TAVI and fully appreciating the consequences of neurological and cognitive insult and injury. Recommendations of the VARC-2 necessitate both a health-specific measure and generalised measure of QoL [34]. Following careful consideration of each (Additional file 2: Table S2), the heart failure specific Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) [35], and the generic European Quality of Life instrument-5D (EQ-5D) [36] were selected. These will be performed prior to and 6 months following index procedure.

Functional outcome measures and frailty

Functional capacity will be measured objectively by the six-minute walk test (6MWT), conducted according to American Thoracic Society guidelines [37]. This simple, practical and inexpensive sub-maximal exercise test assesses functional capacity [38], is closely linked to activities of daily living and has been proposed as both a functional status indicator and an outcome measure [39]. Similarly, gait speed is an important indicator of frailty [40], with slow gait a strong predictor of adverse outcomes, including disability, high healthcare utilisation and mortality [41].

Frailty describes a vulnerability to adverse events that is associated with, but separate from chronological age [42]. Implicitly, all patients requiring TAVI as opposed to open aortic valve surgery must have frailty as a barrier to standard treatment. Frailty is therefore an important contributor to the choice of TAVI and a potential confounder regarding outcomes, including delirium [43]. The SANITY study will utilise the Deficit accumulation score, which provides a robust measure of frailty and an appreciation of those who are unable to complete performance based tests - the frailest frail [44].

Endpoint definitions

The endpoints for the SANITY study are outlined in Figure 4. The primary endpoint focuses on the characterisation and quantification of the neurological injury as detected by new ischemic lesions on MRI. Secondary endpoints focus on the clinically apparent neurological injury sustained and markers of insult/injury.

Figure 4
figure 4

Overview of SANITY variables and endpoints.

Full size image

Statistical analysis

An estimated 100 patients will be recruited into this study, fifty in each of the two treatment arms (SAVR and TAVI) and at least 20 patients in each TAVI subgroup (transfemoral and transapical/transaortic). Fifty patients per group provides 90% power to detect differences in the incidence of new DWI lesions (primary endpoint) with two-sided statistical significance of 5%, assuming overall incidence estimates of 76% and 45% with TAVI and SAVR, respectively, as previously reported.

Multiple regression models will be used to adjust for potential confounders identified based upon clinical importance and statistical selection. The key output will be the estimated treatment difference and 95% confidence intervals for the primary group from the multiple regression models. Additionally, longitudinal analysis will be used to examine all outcomes with repeated data, again using multiple regression models. Treatment failure and withdrawal will be considered on an intention-to-treat basis, with the aim of providing a more realistic estimate of the difference between groups in clinical practice.

Discussion

The SANITY Study offers the most comprehensive neurological/neurocognitive assessment of the TAVI and high-risk SAVR patient population to date. Additionally, well-established and recommended assessments are complemented by those that are novel and unique, thereby offering the potential of improved understanding of the interventions in question, correlation of risk factors and prognostic markers, and validation of assessment tools themselves. Such knowledge is vital to establishing both suitable assessment batteries and guidelines in this unique, high-risk group of patients, and to advancing strategies for neurological injury reduction.

Limitations

Across all TAVI literature, the identification of risk-matched control groups has proven controversial. The validity of high-risk SAVR patients as a 'control group’ has previously been questioned, given that the level of health risk is a factor determining suitability for the procedure. Such difference also exists between access approaches, with transapical/transaortic typically considered a second line option where severe vascular disease excludes a transfemoral approach. Furthermore, these procedures differ vastly, most notably in the use of cardiopulmonary bypass, obscuring the exact cause of any difference identified between study groups. However, comparison between these two groups does offer clinical relevance as SAVR is the current 'gold-standard’ for eligible patients with AS and the challenge is in selecting the most appropriate procedure in patients who are considered suitable for both.

This study will be non-randomised and non-blinded. Though multiple regression analysis will be used to minimise confounding, this is not a substitute for blinding or randomisation, and unmeasured confounders may produce hidden bias.

Finally, a clinical follow-up duration of 6 months limits conclusions regarding delayed and late neurological injury. However, such a timeframe can be justified, given that DWI findings resolve within this period and reversible neurocognitive deficits generally resolve by 3 months [12]. Consequently, the financial costs and patient burdens of prolonging follow-up cannot be ethically justified.

References

  1. Fanning JP, Platts DG, Walters DL, Fraser JF: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI): Valve design and evolution. Int J Cardiol. 2013, 168 (3): 1822-1831. 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.07.117.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Fanning JP, Walters DL, Platts DG, Eeles E, Bellapart J, Fraser JF: Characterization of Neurological Injury in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: How Clear Is the Picture?. Circulation. 2014, 129 (4): 504-515. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.004103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Eggebrecht H, Schmermund A, Voigtlander T, Kahlert P, Erbel R, Mehta RH: Risk of stroke after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI): a meta-analysis of 10,037 published patients. Eurointervention. 2012, 8 (1): 129-138. 10.4244/EIJV8I1A20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Vasques F, Messori A, Lucenteforte E, Biancari F: Immediate and late outcome of patients aged 80 years and older undergoing isolated aortic valve replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 48 studies. Am Heart J. 2012, 163 (3): 477-485. 10.1016/j.ahj.2011.12.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. O'Brien SM, Shahian DM, Filardo G, Ferraris VA, Haan CK, Rich JB, Normand SLT, DeLong ER, Shewan CM, Dokholyan RS, Peterson ED, Edwards FH, Anderson RP, Society of Thoracic Surgeons Quality Measurement Task Force: The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2008 Cardiac Surgery Risk Models: Part 2, Isolated Valve Surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009, 88 (1, Supplement): S23-S42. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.05.056.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tay ELW, Gurvitch R, Wijesinghe N, Nielispach F, Wood D, Cheung A, Ye J, Lichtenstein SV, Carere R, Thompson C, Webb JG: A high-risk period for cerebrovascular events exists after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2011, 4 (12): 1290-1297. 10.1016/j.jcin.2011.08.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Miller DC, Blackstone EH, Mack MJ, Svensson LG, Kodali SK, Kapadia S, Rajeswaran J, Anderson WN, Moses JW, Tuzcu EM, Webb JG, Leon MB, Smith CR, PARTNER Trial Investigators and Patients; PARTNER Stroke Substudy Writing Group and Executive Committee: Transcatheter (TAVR) versus surgical (AVR) aortic valve replacement: occurrence, hazard, risk factors, and consequences of neurologic events in the PARTNER trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012, 143 (4): 832-843. 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.01.055.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Astarci P, Glineur D, Kefer J, D'Hoore W, Renkin J, Vanoverschelde J-L, El Khoury G, Grandin C: Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of cerebral embolization during percutaneous aortic valve implantation: comparison of transfemoral and trans-apical approaches using Edwards Sapiens valve. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011, 40 (2): 475-479.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kahlert PMD, Al-Rashid FMD, Dottger PMS, Mori KMS, Plicht BMD, Wendt DMD, Bergmann LMD, Desa , Kottenberg EMD, Schlamann MMD, Mummel P, Holle D, Thielmann M, Jakob HG, Konorza T, Heusch G, Erbel R, Eggebrecht H: Cerebral embolization during transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a transcranial doppler study. Circulation. 2012, 126 (10): 1245-1255. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.092544.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Omran H, Schmidt H, Hackenbroch M, Illien S, Bernhardt P, von der Recke G, Fimmers R, Flacke S, Layer GN, Pohl C: Silent and apparent cerebral embolism after retrograde catheterisation of the aortic valve in valvular stenosis: a prospective, randomised study. Lancet. 2003, 361 (9365): 1241-1246. 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12978-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rudolph JL, Schreiber KA, Culley DJ, McGlinchey RE, Crosby G, Levitsky S, Marcantonio ER: Measurement of post-operative cognitive dysfunction after cardiac surgery: a systematic review. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2010, 54 (6): 663-677. 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2010.02236.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Saczynski JS, Marcantonio ER, Quach L, Fong TG, Gross A, Inouye SK, Jones RN: Cognitive Trajectories after Postoperative Delirium. N Engl J Med. 2012, 367 (1): 30-39. 10.1056/NEJMoa1112923.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Meller S, Baumbach A, Voros S, Mullen M, Lansky A: Challenges in cardiac device innovation: is neuroimaging an appropriate endpoint? Consensus from the 2013 Yale-UCL Cardiac Device Innovation Summit. BMC Medicine. 2013, 11 (1): 257-10.1186/1741-7015-11-257.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Van Mieghem NM, Schipper MEI, Ladich E, Faqiri E, van der Boon R, Randjgari A, Schultz C, Moelker A, Van Geuns R-J, Otsuka F, Serruys PW, Virmani R, De Jaegere PP: Histopathology of embolic debris captured during transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Circulation. 2013, 127 (22): 2194-2201. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.001091.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Caplan Lr HM: Impaired clearance of emboli (washout) is an important link between hypoperfusion, embolism, and ischemic stroke. Arch Neurol. 1998, 55 (11): 1475-1482. 10.1001/archneur.55.11.1475.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bila RH, Augustine T, Hartley M, Humphries C, Roberts S, Moore R, Sogliani F: Cerebral oximetry monitoring during transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) [Conference Abstract]. Innovations: Technology and Techniques in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery. 2012, 7 (2): 134-

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kappetein AP, Head SJ, Genereux P, Piazza N, Van Mieghem NM, Blackstone EH, Brott TG, Cohen DJ, Cutlip DE, Van Es GA, Hahn RT, Kirtane AJ, Krucoff MW, Kodali S, Mack MJ, Mehran R, Rodés-Cabau J, Vranckx P, Webb JG, Windecker S, Serruys PW, Leon MB: Updated standardized endpoint definitions for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 consensus document. Eur Heart J. 2012, 33 (19): 2403-2418. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs255.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Godefroy O, Fickl A, Roussel M, Auribault C, Bugnicourt JM, Lamy C, Canaple S, Petitnicolas G: Is the montreal cognitive assessment superior to the mini-mental state examination to detect poststroke cognitive impairment?: a study with neuropsychological evaluation. Stroke. 2011, 42 (6): 1712-1716. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.606277.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Inouye SK, Van Dyck CH, Alessi CA, Balkin S, Siegal AP, Horwitz RI: Clarifying confusion: the confusion assessment method. Ann Intern Med. 1990, 113 (12): 941-10.7326/0003-4819-113-12-941.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Seco M, Edelman JJB, Wilson MK, Bannon PG, Vallely MP: Serum biomarkers of neurologic injury in cardiac operations. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012, 94 (3): 1026-1033. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.04.142.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Colli A, D’Amico R, Kempfert J, Borger MA, Mohr FW, Walther T: Transesophageal echocardiographic scoring for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: impact of aortic cusp calcification on postoperative aortic regurgitation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011, 142 (5): 1229-1235. 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.04.026.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lenders GD, Paelinck BP, Wouters K, Claeys MJ, Rodrigus IE, Van Herck PL, Vrints CJ, Bosmans JM: Transesophageal echocardiography for cardiac thromboembolic risk assessment in patients with severe, symptomatic aortic valve stenosis referred for potential transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Am J Cardiol. 2013, 111 (10): 1470-1474. 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.01.302.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. American Heart Association: Heart disease and stroke statistics: 2005 update. 2004, Dallas, Texas: American Heart Association

    Google Scholar 

  24. Aono Y, Ohkubo T, Kikuya M, Hara A, Kondo T, Obara T, Metoki H, Inoue R, Asayama K, Shintani Y, Hashimoto J, Totsune K, Hoshi H, Satoh H, Izumi S, Imai Y: Plasma fibrinogen, ambulatory blood pressure, and silent cerebrovascular lesions: the Ohasama study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2007, 27: 963-968. 10.1161/01.ATV.0000258947.17570.38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Allison MA, Criqui M, Wright CM: Patterns and risk factors for systemic calcified atherosclerosis. Ateriosclerosis Thrombosis and Vascular Biology. 2004, 24: 331-336. 10.1161/01.ATV.0000110786.02097.0c.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Agaston AS, Janowitz WR, Hildner FJ, Zusmer NR, Viamonte M, Detrano R: Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990, 14 (4): 827-832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Allen LM, Hasso AN, Handwerker J, Farid H: Sequence-specific MR Imaging Findings that are useful in Dating Ischemic Stroke. RadioGraphics. 2012, 32: 1285-1297. 10.1148/rg.325115760.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Schlaug G, Siewert B, Benfield A, Edelman RR, Warach S: Time course of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) abnormality in human stroke. Neurology. 1997, 49 (1): 113-119. 10.1212/WNL.49.1.113.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Paarmann H, Heringlake M, Heinze H, Hanke T, Sier H, Karsten J, Schon J: Non-invasive cerebral oxygenation reflects mixed venous oxygen saturation during the varying haemodynamic conditions in patients undergoing transapical transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2012, 14 (3): 268-272. 10.1093/icvts/ivr102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Sa K, Pb S, Klein KUA: Transcranial doppler and near infrared spectroscopy in the perioperative period. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2013, 26 (5): 543-548. 10.1097/01.aco.0000432517.70844.a6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Bila RH, Augustine T, Hartley M, Humphries C, Roberts S, Moore R, Sogliani F: Cerebral oximetry monitoring during transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Conference Abstract from: Innovations: Technology and Techniques in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery 2012, Conference: 15th Annual Meeting of the International Society for Minimally Invasive Cardiothoracic Surgery, ISMICS 2012. 2012, Los Angeles, CA United States: Conference Publication: (var.pagings), 7(2):134

    Google Scholar 

  32. Brodt J, Maratea E: Cerebral Oxygenation During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation. Poster session presented at: Anesthesiology 2012. 2012, Washington, D.C., United States: American Society of Anesthesiologists Annual Meeting,

    Google Scholar 

  33. Kapadia S: Three-Year Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) in "inoperable" Patients with severe Aortic Stenosis: The PARTNER Trial. 2012, Miami, FL, USA: Presentation at: Transcatheter Cardiovascular Therapies (TCT) 2012

    Google Scholar 

  34. Chou CC, Lien LM, Chen WH, Wu MS, Lin SM, Chiu HC, Chiou HY, Bai CH: Adults with late stage 3 chronic kidney disease are at high risk for prevalent silent brain infarction: a population-based study. Stroke. 2011, 42 (8): 2120-2125. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.597930.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Green CP, Porter CB, Bresnahan DR, Spertus JA: Development and evaluation of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire: a new health status measure for heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000, 35 (5): 1245-1255. 10.1016/S0735-1097(00)00531-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Group TE: EuroQol - a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy. 1990, 16 (3): 199-208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Eguchi K, Kario K, Hoshide S, Hoshide Y, Ishikawa J, Morinari M, Hashimoto T, Shimada K: Smoking is associated with silent cerebrovascular disease in a high-risk Japanese community-dwelling population. Hypertens Res. 2004, 27 (10): 747-754. 10.1291/hypres.27.747.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Eguchi K, Kario K, Shimada K: Greater impact of coexistence of hypertension and diabetes on silent cerebral infarcts. Stroke. 2003, 34 (10): 2471-2474. 10.1161/01.STR.0000089684.41902.CD.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Feiwell RJ, Besmertis L, Sarkar R, Saloner DA, Rapp JH: Detection of clinically silent infarcts after carotid endarterectomy by use of diffusion-weighted imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2001, 22 (4): 646-649.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Fujishima M, Yao H, Terashi A, Tagawa K, Matsumoto M, Hara H, Akiguchi I, Suzuki K, Nishimaru K, Udaka F, Gyoten T, Takeuchi J, Hamada R, Yoshida Y, Ibayashi S: Deep white matter lesions on MRI, and not silent brain infarcts are related to headache and dizziness of non-specific cause in non-stroke Japanese subjects. Intern Med. 2000, 39 (9): 727-731. 10.2169/internalmedicine.39.727.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Gerriets T, Swarz N, Bachmann G, Kaps M, Kloevekorn WP, Sammer G, Tschernatsch M, Nottbohm R, Blaes F, Schönburg M: Evaluation of methods to predict early long-term neurobehavioral outcome after coronary artery bypass grafting. Am J Cardiol. 2010, 105 (8): 1095-1101. 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.12.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. McMillan GJ, Hubbard RE: Frailty in older inpatients: what physicians need to know. QJM. 2012, 105 (11): 1059-1065. 10.1093/qjmed/hcs125.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Eeles EMP, White SV, O'Mahony SM, Bayer AJ, Hubbard RE: The impact of frailty and delirium on mortality in older inpatients. Age Ageing. 2012, 41 (3): 412-416. 10.1093/ageing/afs021.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Rockwood K, Mitnitski A: Frailty in Relation to the Accumulation of Deficits. J Gerontol A: Biol Med Sci. 2007, 62 (7): 722-727. 10.1093/gerona/62.7.722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Pre-publication history

Download references

Acknowledgements

JPF supported by The Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand (CSANZ) Research Scholarship, The University of Queensland Research Scholarship and The Prince Charles Hospital Foundation (TPCHF) Research Grants. JFF supported by the Office of Health and Medical Research (OHMR) fellowship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

    Jonathon P Fanning, Allan J Wesley, David G Platts, Darren L Walters, Eamonn M Eeles, Judith Bellapart & John F Fraser

  2. Critical Care Research Group (CCRG), The Prince Charles Hospital, Rode Road, Chermside, Brisbane, Queensland, 4032, Australia

    Jonathon P Fanning, David G Platts, Oystein Tronstad, Judith Bellapart & John F Fraser

  3. The Heart and Lung Institute, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

    Jonathon P Fanning, David G Platts, Darren L Walters, Oystein Tronstad, Andrew J Clarke, Peter J Tesar & John F Fraser

  4. Department of Medical Imaging, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

    Allan J Wesley & Wendy Strugnell

  5. School of Medicine, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia

    Michael Seco & Michael P Vallely

  6. The Baird Institute, Sydney, NSW, Australia

    Michael Seco & Michael P Vallely

  7. Department of Internal Medicine, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

    Eamonn M Eeles

  8. Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

    Oystein Tronstad, Andrew J Clarke & Peter J Tesar

  9. Department of Cardiology, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

    David G Platts & Darren L Walters

  10. School of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

    Adrian G Barnett

  11. The Royal Prince Alfred, Sydney, NSW, Australia

    Michael P Vallely

  12. Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia

    Michael P Vallely

  13. Adult Intensive Care Unit, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

    John F Fraser

Authors
  1. Jonathon P Fanning
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Allan J Wesley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. David G Platts
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Darren L Walters
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Eamonn M Eeles
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Michael Seco
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Oystein Tronstad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Wendy Strugnell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Adrian G Barnett
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Andrew J Clarke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Judith Bellapart
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Michael P Vallely
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Peter J Tesar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. John F Fraser
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathon P Fanning.

Additional information

Competing interests

DW is a consultant to Medtronic and Edwards, investigator for Edwards, Medtronic and Boston Scientific clinical studies and past proctor for Edwards. MV is a member of the Medtronic Asia-Pacific Surgical Advisory Board. No other author declares competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

JPF and JFF were involved in the conception and design of study and drafting of the manuscript. AW, MS, EE, OT, WS and AB were involved in the design of the study and drafting of the manuscript. AC, JB, MV, DP, DW and PT were involved in the design of the study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Electronic supplementary material

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fanning, J.P., Wesley, A.J., Platts, D.G. et al. The silent and apparent neurological injury in transcatheter aortic valve implantation study (SANITY): concept, design and rationale. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 14, 45 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2261-14-45

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2261-14-45

Keywords

BMC Cardiovascular Disorders

ISSN: 1471-2261

Contact us