We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly. Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact us so we can address the problem.

Simvastatin down-regulates the production of Interleukin-8 by neutrophil leukocytes from dyslipidemic patients

  • Franca Marino1,
  • Andrea Maria Maresca1Email author,
  • Luana Castiglioni1,
  • Marco Cosentino1,
  • Ramona C Maio1,
  • Laura Schembri1,
  • Catherine Klersy2,
  • Christian Mongiardi1,
  • Laura Robustelli Test1,
  • Anna Maria Grandi1 and
  • Luigina Guasti1
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders201414:37

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2261-14-37

Received: 25 September 2013

Accepted: 6 March 2014

Published: 15 March 2014

Abstract

Background

Neutrophil (PMN) leukocytes participate to the initial phases of atherosclerosis through the release of Interleukin 8 (CxCL8; IL-8) that contribute to amplification of inflammation. Aim of the study is to investigate the production of IL-8 by PMN leukocytes from dyslipidemic patients treated with simvastatin.

Methods

In 15 dyslipidemic subjects with moderately increased cardiovascular risk, assessed by Framingham Risk Score, blood samples were obtain to investigate PMNs IL-8 production [at baseline and after N-formyl-Met-Leu-Phe (fMLP) stimulation] before and after long-term (1-year) simvastatin treatment.

Results

The resting release of IL-8 was higher in dyslipidemic patients at baseline when compared with control subjects (p < 0.05). One year of treatment was significantly associated with reduced IL-8 production (p < 0.01). Moreover, the fMLP-induced IL-8 production in dyslipidemic untreated patients was higher than that of controls (p < 0.05) and was reduced after simvastatin treatment (p < 0.01). IL-8 release after 1 year of treatment was reduced to levels which were lower than those observed in control subjects both for resting and stimulated cytokine production (p < 0.01).

Conclusions

Prolonged treatment with simvastatin is associated with a reduction of IL-8 production, suggesting the possibility of statin to modulate the pro-inflammatory response in PMNs of patients with moderately increased cardiovascular risk.

Keywords

Neutrophils Interleukin-8 Dyslipidemia Statin

Background

Inflammation plays a key role in the beginning and progression of atherosclerosis [1]. The relation of coronary artery disease with systemic inflammation is confirmed by the closely association between serum markers of inflammation and risk of cardiovascular events [2, 3].

Polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNs) are effector cells in many inflammatory conditions [4]. These cells produce a large amount of reactive oxygen species, involved in lipid oxidation [5]. In addition, stimulated and activated PMNs release cytokines that produce impairment of endothelial function [6]. On stimulation, PMNs release cytokines such as IL-8 that promote endothelial cell activation and may further affect their recruitment [7]. As regards the functional alterations which occur at the cellular level in atherosclerosis, although a primed state of PMNs - associated with increased oxidative stress, pro-inflammatory cytokine release and increased Angiotensin II type 1 receptor expression - has been described in humans with high cardiovascular risk, hypercholesterolemia, hypertension, diabetes and renal failure, only few data are reported about the potential role of pharmacological treatment on the functional properties of PMNs [813]. Previous studies from our group showed that short-term simvastatin treatment was able to affect PMNs functional responses [1113], however the effect of prolonged statin treatment on IL-8 production has not yet been investigated. Aim of our study was to asses the production of IL-8 by PMN leukocytes from dyslipidemic patients treated with simvastatin.

Methods

Subjects

In 15 dyslipidemic patients at moderately increased cardiovascular risk, assessed by Framingham Risk Score [14], who had signed a written informed consent before enrolling in the study, PMNs were isolated from venous blood (see below) before any pharmacological treatment and during short-term (1 month) and long-term (1 year) simvastatin treatment (20 mg assumed at 10 PM) to investigate IL-8 cellular production.

Subjects were enrolled consecutively at our Lipid Clinic (Clinical Medicine, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy).

Inclusion criteria were:
  • increased cardiovascular risk showing a “moderate risk” for vascular events according to the National Cholesterol Education Program - Adult Treatment Panel III (ATPIII) guidelines [14]; patients enrolled at “moderate risk” showed in fact two or more risk factors and a 10-year cardiovascular risk < 20% when calculated according to the Framingham algorithm.

  • no disease (except dyslipidemia and/or mild hypertension) found after a clinical examination and routine laboratory tests.

  • clinical indication of lipid-lowering pharmacological treatment with statins

  • no pharmacological treatment.

  • Exclusion criteria were:

  • documented ischemic heart disease or “equivalent ischemic heart disease” [14]

  • diabetes

  • ongoing clinical infection or presence of infections in the previous three months

  • smoking habitus

  • competitive sporting activities.

After 6 weeks of life-style modification including dietary treatment (qualitative counselling) and recommendations for mild physical activity, patients were asked to maintain the same level of physical activity and a similar diet throughout the study; besides the evaluations scheduled for the study on neutrophils at 1 month and 1 year, patients were followed for clinical evaluations and standard laboratory exams after starting statin therapy.

A group of 15 healthy subjects selected from a population evaluated for a general clinical check-up was also enrolled: all patients were evaluated with a clinical visit including familiar and personal history.

Blood samplings were obtained to perform routine laboratory exams and to isolate circulating PMNs by using heparinized tubes between 8.00 and 9.00 AM, after a fasting night. All patients were previously asked not to take coffees, teas, chocolates or cola-containing substances for the 24 hours preceding the evaluations.

The following laboratory exams were performed:

 Haemocromocytometric exam, plasma creatinine, urea, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, gamma glutamyl transpeptidase, alkaline phosphatase, creatine kinase, thyroid stimulating hormone, urinary proteins, plasma protein electrophoresis, fasting glucose: they resulted in the two groups within the normal limits and no clinically relevant change was observed during treatment (data not shown).

 Total cholesterol, high density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-c), low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-c), triglycerides, apolipoprotein A, apolipoprotein B, high-sensitive C-reactive protein (CRP).

The study protocol was approved by “Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedale di Circolo e Fondazione Macchi” Ethics Committee.

PMN isolation

Whole blood was allowed to sediment on dextran at 37°C for 30 min. Supernatant was recovered and PMNs were isolated by standard density-gradient centrifugation as previously described [13]. Contaminating erythrocytes were eliminated by 10 minutes hypotonic lysis in distilled water with added NH4Cl 8.2 g/l, KHCO3 1.0 g/l, and EDTA 37.0 mg/l. Cells were then washed three times in NaCl 0.15 M. Purity and viability of PMNs preparations were always >95% and no platelets or erythrocytes could be detected either by light microscopic examination or by flow cytometric analysis.

PMN production of CXCL8

To assess IL-8 production, PMNs were re-suspended at the concentration of 1×107 cells/ml in RPMI medium and incubated alone (resting IL-8 production) or in the presence of 0.1 μM of fMLP (stimulated IL-8 production) at 37°C for 5 hours. After incubation, cells were centrifuged (600 g, 5 min, 20°C) and supernatant was harvested for IL-8 assay. IL-8 levels in PMN supernatants were quantified using a sandwich-type enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA kit; Amersham Biosciences, UK). Detection limit of the assay was 1 pg/ml.

Levels of IL-8 were determined in a duplicate way and production of PMNs IL-8 was measured in all patients and controls.

Statistical analysis

Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) and median and 25th-75th percentile range (IQR), as needed. The levels of IL-8 had not a normal distribution, so we have applied non-parametric tests. Comparisons between dependent measures were performed with the Wilcoxon test. The Bonferroni correction was applied for post-hoc comparisons. Comparisons between independent measures were performed with the MannWhitney U test. The mean difference and its 95% confidence interval (95% CI) was computed to quantify both changes in time and differences between cases and controls. Correlation analysis was performed by Pearson test. Calculations were performed using a commercial software (GraphPad Prism version 4.00 for Windows, GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA, http://www.graphpad.com) and a two-sided P < 0.05 was retained for statistical significance.

Results

Baseline characteristics of dyslipidemic patients and controls are shown in Table 1. The two groups were similar for age, sex, BMI and blood pressure values.
Table 1

Clinical and demographic characteristics of dyslipidemic patients and controls at baseline

 

Dyslipidemic patients (n = 15)

Controls (n = 15)

P

Age (years)

57 ± 11

53 ± 13

ns

Female (n, %)

8 (53%)

4 (27%)

ns

BMI (kg/m2)

26 ± 2

26 ± 2

ns

SBP/DBP (mmHg)

135 ± 14/83 ± 7

122 ± 35/83 ± 8

ns

10 years-cardiovascular risk (%)

9.5 ± 2.1

3.3 ± 1.8

0.01

BMI: body mass index; SBP: Systolic blood pressure; DBP: Diastolic blood pressure.

No patients were lost to the follow up.

IL-8 production from PMNs of dyslipidemic patients and controls

The resting release of IL-8 was different between controls and dyslipidemic subjects at baseline [mean difference (95% C.I.): −280.4 pg/ml (IQR: −454.0 to −106.8), p < 0.05]. One year of treatment significantly reduced IL-8 production [mean difference (95% C.I.): 399.5 pg/ml (IQR: 187.7 to 611.3)]. IL-8 production after 1 year of treatment was reduced to levels which were lower than those observed in control subjects [mean difference (95% C.I.): 119.1 pg/ml (IQR: 66.8 to 171.4)] (Figure 1, left panel).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2261-14-37/MediaObjects/12872_2013_Article_857_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

IL-8 production in resting (left panel) and fMLP-induced (right panel) PMNs from dyslipidemic subjects before (baseline) and during statin treatment. Horizontal lines represent the median values, boxes represent the 25th-75th percentiles, and vertical bars the minimum and maximum values. For comparison, data obtained in healthy controls are also shown: median values (solid lines) with 25th-75th percentiles (dotted lines). * = P < 0.05 and ** = P < 0.01 vs control subjects. # = P < 0.01 vs baseline.

Moreover, the fMLP-induced IL-8 production in untreated dyslipidemic patients was higher than that of controls [mean difference (95% C.I.): −263.4 pg/ml (IQR: −469.0 to −57.91), p < 0.05]. The stimulated IL-8 production was reduced after simvastatin treatment [mean difference (95% C.I.): 543.9 pg/ml (IQR: 356.8 to 731.0)]. The values measured at 1-year follow-up were lower than those observed in control subjects [mean difference (95% C.I.): 280.5 pg/ml (IQR: 170.8 to 390.1)] (Figure 1, right panel).

Basal levels of IL-8 didn’t correlate to age (r = 0.463, P = ns), CRP (r = 0.341, P = ns), non-HDL cholesterol (r = 0.317, P = ns) and apoB/apoA ratio (r = 0.301, P = ns).

We didn’t found a significant correlation between IL-8 reduction (from baseline to 1 year) and changes of other parameters (LDL-cholesterol, CRP).

Clinical and lipid profile changes during statin treatment in dyslipidemic patients

Body mass index and blood pressure values did not significantly change during follow-up. The lipid profile of patients and controls at baseline and after 1 year is shown in Table 2. As expected, in dyslipidemic patients, total cholesterol, LDL-c and apolipoprotein B were significantly reduced at 1-year evaluation compared to baseline evaluation [total cholesterol: 204 mg/dL (IQR: 171–232) vs 276 mg/dL (IQR: 256–330), P < 0.0001; LDLc: 118 mg/dL (IQR: 103–149) vs 202 mg/dL (IQR: 191–246), P < 0.0001; apolipoprotein B: 100 mg/dL (IQR: 86–119) vs 164 mg/dL (IQR: 157–219), P = 0.0001]. HDL-c, triglycerides and apolipoprotein A did not significantly change during follow-up. We performed a subgroup analysis by gender (Table 3) and we observed a major reduction of LDL-cholesterol in women. Moreover, CRP values was significantly reduced during treatment [2.99 mg/L (IQR: 1.33-4.86) and 1.5 mg/L (IQR: 1.0-2.6), P < 0.01)].
Table 2

Lipid profile of dyslipidemic patients and controls at baseline and after 1 year

 

Dyslipidemic patients (n = 15)

Controls (n = 15)

 

Baseline

After 1 year

Baseline

After 1 year

Total cholesterol (mg/dl)

276 (256–330)

204 (171–232)*

245 (188–266)°

188 (165–200)

HDL-cholesterol (mg/dl)

50 (47–57)

52 (49–65)

56 (47–63)

53 (46–65)

LDL-cholesterol (mg/dl)

202 (191–246)

118 (103–149)*

163 (116–175)°

112 (87–122)

Triglycerides (mg/dl)

141 (115–190)

144 (87–154)

159 (74–198)

133 (84–160)

Apoliprotein B (mg/dl)

164 (157–219)

100 (86–119)*

140 (119–157)°

149 (128–185)

Apoliprotein A (mg/dl)

143 (135–162)

141 (136–175)

105 (91–146)

99 (77–116)

*vs baseline (p < 0.0001).

°vs dyslipidemic patients at baseline (p < 0.001).

Table 3

Modification in lipid profile of dyslipidemic patients after simvastatin treatment by gender

 

Male (n = 7)

Female (n = 8)

 

Baseline

After treatment

Baseline

After treatment

Total cholesterol (mg/dl)

260 (236–316)

208 (172–263)

299 (278–347)

199 (176–229)*

LDL-cholesterol (mg/dl)

186 (172–207)

120 (99–160) +

207 (187–244)

118 (142–203)*

HDL-cholesterol (mg/dl)

50 (47–57)

54 (48–70)

51 (47–60)

52 (49–63)

Tryglicerides (mg/dl)

115 (87–134)

114 (83–167)

180 (142–203)

149 (95–153)

Apolipoprotein A (mg/dl)

141 (136–152)

136 (127–166)

145 (134–163)

147 (136–177)

Apolipoprotein B (mg/dl)

151 (139–168)

90 (85–126)+

180 (136–269)

101 (91–119)*

*vs baseline (p = 0.001).

+vs baseline (p = 0.05).

Discussion

It is clear that atherosclerosis is a chronic disease of arterial wall in which immuno-inflammatory mechanisms are involved [15]. It is well known the role of monocytes, as representatives of the innate immune system, in atherosclerosis development [16]. Since a body of research carried out over the last decade has disclosed the complex behaviour of PMNs, unraveling a key role in the onset and progression of atheroma, we decided to focus our attention on these cells [17].

The main finding of this study is the observation that a prolonged treatment with statin, in patients with increased cardiovascular risk, is consistently associated with reduction in IL-8 cellular production by primed neutrophils. Pathogenic effects of PMNs in atherosclerosis are mediated through production of pro-inflammatory cytokines [IL-8, tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFa)] and reactive oxygen species [18]. Chemokines are a number of small, inducible, proinflammatory proteins that direct migration of circulating leukocytes to sites of inflammation. This superfamily is divided into α and β-chemokine subfamilies. IL-8 is one of the main proinflammatory cytokine produced by neutrophils and it is the prototypical member of α-chemokine subfamily [1924]. Generation of IL-8 can be expected upon infection, ischemia, trauma and other disturbances of tissue homeostasis since the levels of IL-1 and TNFa, which are important IL-8 inducers, are elevated. IL-8 is likely to be the main cause of local accumulation of neutrophils [20]. IL-8 might have atherogenic function through multiple actions: it facilitates recruitment of neutrophils and T-lymphocytes into sub-endothelial space, monocytes activation and adhesion to endothelium [21, 22], migration of vascular smooth muscle cells [22]. Macrophage-derivated human foam cells contain high amounts of IL-8 [23, 24]. It has also been reported that apparently healthy subjects in the highest serum IL-8 level quartile had an increased risk of coronary events when compared with those in the lowest quartile [25].

In our study we observed a lack of significant correlation between basal levels of IL-8 and age, CRP, non HDL cholesterol and apoB/apoA ratio. Furthermore despite a similar reduction after simvastatin treatment (from baseline to 1 year) of IL-8, LDL cholesterol and CRP, we did not see any significant correlation. From our point of view these results are largely explained by the small sample size of the study.

Statins have pharmacological activities independently of their lipid-lowering action, that can be in part attributed to their ability to interfere with inflammatory mechanisms [26]. Among the several ancillary actions of statins, these drugs are able to down-regulate expression of adhesion molecules, to inhibit expression of chemokine monocyte chemo-attractant protein-1 in activated leukocytes, to block expression of integrins and to reduce monocytes adhesiveness to endothelium [2730]. As regards IL-8 production by human neutrophils, it has been demonstrated that simvastatin treatment could reduce peripheral blood monocyte mRNA expression of IL-8 and IL-6 and monocyte chemo-attractant protein-1 after 6 week of treatment [31] and we reported that cellular PMNs IL-8 release was reduced upon 1-month statin therapy [12]. In this study, one year of simvastatin treatment reduced IL-8 production in comparison to pre-treatment values, thus excluding the occurrence of a potential tolerance phenomenon after long-term treatment. Moreover, IL-8 production after 1 year of treatment was reduced to levels which were lower than those observed in control subjects. Our results seem to suggest that simvastatin can contribute to modulate inflammation by IL-8 reduction.

In our study simvastatin treatment reduced LDL cholesterol in men and in women, but the degree of this lowering was more evident in females. This result may be in part due to a higher LDL cholesterol baseline value than in men and to the prevalent menopausal status in enrolled women. Nevertheless the small sample size (8 women) does not allow to draw definitive conclusions. From recent meta-analyses statin therapy is associated with significant decreases in cardiovascular events and in all-cause mortality in women and men [32].

The study has some limitations: 1) we have not collected informations about subclinical atherosclerosis (intima-media thickness, carotid plaque); 2) we have evaluated IL-8 production as marker of inflammatory response, but inflammation can also be evaluated by several different parameters, such as IL-6, IL-15, TNFα, not assessed in this study.

Conclusions

Our results show an enhanced production of IL-8 in patients at moderately increased risk for vascular disease. Simvastatin treatment is associated with a reduced production of IL-8 from PMNs in a long-time treatment.

Abbreviations

PMNs: 

Neutrophils, polymorphonuclear leukocytes

IL-8: 

CXCL8, interleukin-8

fMLP: 

N-formyl-Met-Leu-Phe

ATPIII: 

Adult Treatment Panel III

HDL-c: 

High density lipoprotein-cholesterol

LDL-c: 

Low density lipoprotein-cholesterol

CRP: 

C-reactive protein

TNFa: 

Tumor necrosis factor alpha.

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Insubria
(2)
Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, IRCCS Policlinico S. Matteo

References

  1. Galkina E, Ley K: Immune and Inflammatory Mechanisms of Atherosclerosis. Annu Rev Immunol. 2009, 27: 165-197. 10.1146/annurev.immunol.021908.132620.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Libby P, Ridker PM, Hansson GK: Inflammation in atherosclerosis: from pathophysiology to practice. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009, 54 (23): 2129-2138. 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.09.009.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Tedgui A, Mallat Z: Cytokines in atherosclerosis: pathogenic and regulatory pathways. Physiol Rev. 2006, 86: 515-581. 10.1152/physrev.00024.2005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Baetta R, Corsini A: Review: Role of polymorphonuclear neutrophils in atherosclerosis: Current state and future perspectives. Atherosclerosis. 2010, 210 (1): 1-13. 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2009.10.028.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Yasunari K, Watanabe T, Nakamura M: Reactive oxygen species formation by polymorphonuclear cells and mononuclear cells as a risk factor of cardiovascular diseases. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2006, 7 (2): 73-80. 10.2174/138920106776597612.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Lefer AM, Lefer DJ: The role of nitric oxide and cell adhesion molecules on the microcirculation in ischaemia-reperfusion. Cardiovasc Res. 1996, 2: 743-751.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Fialkow L, Wang Y, Downey GP: Reactive oxygen and nitrogen species as signaling molecules regulating neutrophil function. Free Radic Biol Med. 2007, 42: 153-164. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2006.09.030.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Kristal B, Shurtz-Swirski R, Chezar J, Manaster J, Levy R, Shapiro G, Weissman I, Shasha SM, Sela S: Participation of peripheral polymorphonuclear leukocytes in the oxidative stress and inflammation in patients with essential hypertension. Am J Hypertens. 1998, 11: 921-928. 10.1016/S0895-7061(98)00099-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Sela S, Shurtz-Swirski R, Cohen-Mazor M, Mazor R, Chezar J, Shapiro G, Hassan K, Shkolnik G, Geron R, Kristal B: The primed peripheral polymorphonuclear leukocytes – a culprit underlying chronic low-grade inflammation and systemic oxidative stress in chronic kidney disease. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005, 16: 2431-2438. 10.1681/ASN.2004110929.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Shurtz-Swirski R, Sela S, Herskovits AT, Shapiro G, Nasser L, Shasha SM, Kristal B: Involvement of polymorphonuclear leukocytes in oxidative stress and inflammation in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2001, 24: 104-110. 10.2337/diacare.24.1.104.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Marino F, Guasti L, Cosentino M, Ferrari M, Rasini E, Maio RC, Cimpanelli MG, Cereda E, Crespi C, Simoni C, Restelli D, Venco A, Lecchini S: Angiotensin II type 1 receptor expression in polymorphonuclear leukocytes from high-risk subjects: changes after treatment with simvastatin. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2007, 49: 299-305. 10.1097/FJC.0b013e31803d35ce.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Guasti L, Marino F, Cosentino M, Cimpanelli M, Maio RC, Klersy C, Crespi C, Restelli D, Simoni C, Franzetti I, Gaudio G, Marnini P, Grandi AM, Lecchini S, Venco A: Simvastatin treatment modifies polymorphonuclear leukocyte function in high-risk subjects: a longitudinal study. J Hypertens. 2006, 24: 2423-2440. 10.1097/01.hjh.0000251903.62804.77.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Guasti L, Marino F, Cosentino M, Maio RC, Rasini E, Ferrari M, Castiglioni L, Klersy C, Gaudio G, Grandi AM, Lecchini S, Venco A: Prolonged Statin-associated Reduction in Neutrophil Reactive Oxygen Species and Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Expression: 1-Year Follow-up. Eur Heart J. 2008, 29: 1118-1126. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn138.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults: Executive Summary of The Third Report of The National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, And Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol In Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). JAMA. 2001, 285: 2486-2497. 10.1001/jama.285.19.2486.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Libby P, Lichtman AH, Hansson GK: Immune effector mechanisms implicated in atherosclerosis: from mice to humans. Immunity. 2013, 39 (2): 413-10.1016/j.immuni.2013.07.015.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Ghattas A, Griffiths HR, Devitt A, Lip GY, Shantsila E: Monocytes in coronary artery disease and atherosclerosis: where are we now?. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013, 62 (17): 1541-1551. 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.07.043.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Della Bona R, Cardillo MT, Leo M, Biasillo G, Gustapane M, Trotta F, Biasucci LM: Polymorphonuclear neutrophils and instability of the atherosclerotic plaque: a causative role?. Inflamm Res. 2013, 62 (6): 537-550. 10.1007/s00011-013-0617-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Scapini P, Lapinet-Vera JA, Gasperini S, Calzetti F, Bazzoni F, Cassatella MA: The neutrophil as a cellular source of chemokines. Immunol Rev. 2000, 177: 195-203. 10.1034/j.1600-065X.2000.17706.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Baggiolini M, Loetscher P, Moser B: Interleukin-8 and chemokine family. Int J Immunopharmacol. 1995, 17: 103-108. 10.1016/0192-0561(94)00088-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Gerszten RE, Garcia-Zepeda EA, Lim YC, Yoshida M, Ding HA, Gimbrone MA, Luster AD, Luscinskas FW, Rosenzweig A: MCP-1 and IL-8 trigger firm adhesion of monocytes to vascular endothelium under flow conditions. Nature. 1999, 398: 718-723. 10.1038/19546.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Matsushima K, Baldwin ET, Mukaida N: Interleukin-8 and MCAF: novel leukocyte recruitment and activating cytokines. Chem Immunol. 1992, 51: 236-265.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Yue TL, Wang X, Sung CP, Olson B, McKenna PJ, Gu JL, Feuerstein GZ: Interleukin-8. A mitogen and chemoattractant for vascular smooth cells. Circ Res. 1994, 75: 1-7. 10.1161/01.RES.75.1.1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Wang N, Tabas I, Winchester R, Ravalli S, Rabbani LE, Tall A: Interleukin 8 Is Induced by Cholesterol Loading of Macrophages and Expressed by Macrophages Foam Cells in Human Atheroma. J Biol Chem. 1996, 271: 8837-8842. 10.1074/jbc.271.15.8837.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Apostolopoulos J, Davenport P, Tipping PG: Interleukin-8 Production by Macrophages From Atheromatous Plaques. Arterioscl Thromb Vasc Biol. 1996, 16: 1007-1012. 10.1161/01.ATV.16.8.1007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Boekholdt SM, Peters RJ, Hack CE, Day NE, Luben R, Bingham SA, Wareham NJ, Reitsma PH, Khaw KT: IL-8 plasma concentrations and the risk of future coronary artery disease in apparently healthy men and women. Arterioscl Thromb Vasc Biol. 2004, 24: 1503-1508. 10.1161/01.ATV.0000134294.54422.2e.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Paoletti R, Gotto AM, Hajjar DP: Inflammation in atherosclerosis and implications for therapy. Circulation. 2004, 109: III20-III26. 10.1161/01.CIR.0000113708.46466.C0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Rezaie-Majd A, Prager GW, Bucek RA, Schernthaner GH, Maca T, Kress HG, Valent P, Binder BR, Minar E, Baghestanian M: Simvastatin reduces the expression of adhesion molecules in circulating monocytes from hypercholesterolemic patients. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2003, 23: 397-403. 10.1161/01.ATV.0000059384.34874.F0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Romano M, Diomede L, Sironi M, Massimiliano L, Sottocorno M, Polentarutti N, Guglielmotti A, Albani D, Bruno A, Fruscella P, Salmona M, Vecchi A, Pinza M, Mantovani A: Inhibition of monocyte chemotactic protein-1 synthesis by statins. Lab Invest. 2000, 80: 1095-1100. 10.1038/labinvest.3780115.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Eccles KA, Sowden H, Porter KE, Parkin SM, Homer-Vanniasinkam S, Graham AM: Simvastatin alters human endothelial cell adhesion molecule expression and inhibits leukocyte adhesion under flow. Atherosclerosis. 2008, 200: 69-79. 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2007.12.018.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Yoshida M, Sawada T, Ishii H, Gerszten RE, Rosenzweig A, Gimbrone MA, Yasukochi Y, Numano F: Hmg-CoA reductase inhibitor modulates monocyte-endothelial cell interaction under physiological flow conditions in vitro: involvement of Rho GTPase-dependent mechanism. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2001, 21: 1165-1171. 10.1161/hq0701.092143.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Rezaie-Majd A, Maca T, Bucek RA, Valent P, Müller MR, Husslein P, Kashanipour A, Minar E, Baghestanian M: Simvastatin reduces expression of cytokines interleukin-6, interleukin-8, and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 in circulating monocytes from hypercholesterolemic patients. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2002, 22: 1194-1199. 10.1161/01.ATV.0000022694.16328.CC.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Kostis WJ, Cheng JQ, Dobrzynski JM, Cabrera J, Kostis JB: Meta-analysis of statin effects in women versus men. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012, 59 (6): 572-582. 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.09.067.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2261/14/37/prepub

Copyright

© Marino et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement