Worsened arterial stiffness in high-risk cardiovascular patients with high habitual carbohydrate intake: a cross-sectional vascular function study
© Chan et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 30 October 2012
Accepted: 5 February 2014
Published: 21 February 2014
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|30 Oct 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|7 Dec 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Georg Biesenbach|
|3 Feb 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Joan Vaccaro|
|5 May 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Yap-Hang Chan|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|5 May 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|14 May 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Joan Vaccaro|
|29 May 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Georg Biesenbach|
|17 Nov 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Yap-Hang Chan|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|17 Nov 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|22 Dec 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - John McClure|
|4 Jan 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Yap-Hang Chan|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|4 Jan 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|5 Feb 2014||Editorially accepted|
|21 Feb 2014||Article published||10.1186/1471-2261-14-24|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.