Validity, intra- and inter-observer reliability of automated devices for the assessment of ankle brachial index using photo-plethysmography
© Teren et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 18 March 2013
Accepted: 3 October 2013
Published: 8 October 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|18 Mar 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|3 May 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Brigitte Escoubet|
|10 Jun 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Emilie Vierron|
|17 Sep 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Markus Scholz|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|17 Sep 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|20 Sep 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Brigitte Escoubet|
|1 Oct 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Emilie Vierron|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|3 Oct 2013||Editorially accepted|
|8 Oct 2013||Article published||10.1186/1471-2261-13-81|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.