Aortic stenosis and mitral regurgitation as predictors of atrial fibrillation during 11 years of follow-up
© Widgren et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 5 December 2011
Accepted: 11 October 2012
Published: 18 October 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|5 Dec 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|20 Jan 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Pansy Tung|
|20 Jan 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Siddharth Mukerji|
|19 Feb 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Veronica Widgren|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|19 Feb 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|2 Mar 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Siddharth Mukerji|
|12 Mar 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Pansy Tung|
|20 Aug 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Veronica Widgren|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|20 Aug 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|11 Oct 2012||Editorially accepted|
|18 Oct 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-2261-12-92|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.