Prognosis after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with psoriasis: a cohort study using Danish nationwide registries
© Ahlehoff et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 8 February 2012
Accepted: 20 September 2012
Published: 24 September 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|8 Feb 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|10 Feb 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Ole Ahlehoff|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|10 Feb 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|20 Jun 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Wayne Gulliver|
|27 Aug 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Nehal Mehta|
|17 Sep 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Ole Ahlehoff|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|17 Sep 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|20 Sep 2012||Editorially accepted|
|24 Sep 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-2261-12-79|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.