Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Lipid accumulation product: a simple and accurate index for predicting metabolic syndrome in Taiwanese people aged 50 and over

BMC Cardiovascular Disorders201212:78

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2261-12-78

Received: 22 May 2012

Accepted: 19 September 2012

Published: 24 September 2012

Abstract

Background

Lipid accumulation product (LAP) has been advocated as a simple clinical indicator of metabolic syndrome (MS). However, no studies have evaluated the accuracy of LAP in predicting MS in Taiwanese adults. The aim of our investigation was to use LAP to predict MS in Taiwanese adults.

Methods

Taiwanese adults aged 50 years and over (n = 513) were recruited from a physical examination center at a regional hospital in southern Taiwan. MS was defined according to the MS criteria for Taiwanese people. LAP was calculated as (waist circumference [cm] − 65) × (triglyceride concentration [mM]) for men, and (waist circumference [cm] − 58) × (triglyceride concentration [mM]) for women. Simple logistic regression and receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were conducted.

Results

The prevalence of MS was 19.5 and 21.5% for males and females, respectively. LAP showed the highest prediction accuracy among adiposity measures with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.901. This was significantly higher than the adiposity measure of waist-to-height ratio (AUC = 0.813).

Conclusions

LAP was a simple and accurate predictor of MS in Taiwanese people aged 50 years and over. LAP had significantly higher predictability than other adiposity measures tested.

Keywords

Adiposity Chinese Metabolic syndrome Prediction

Background

Metabolic syndrome (MS) is a condition that includes the presence of a cluster of risk factors specific for cardiovascular disease [1, 2], type 2 diabetes mellitus [3], hypertension [4], and all-cause mortality [5]. Several diagnostic criteria have evolved since the World Health Organization task force on diabetes identified insulin resistance as the dominant cause of MS in 1998 [6]. Over time, several definitions of MS have been proposed, with criteria based on various combinations of abdominal or visceral obesity, insulin resistance, raised blood pressure, and dyslipidemia [7]. In Taiwan, the latest definition of MS (MS-TW) recommended by the Bureau of Health Promotion in the Department of Health is based on the United States National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III criteria (NCEP ATP III) [8], with modifications. According to MS-TW, the diagnosis of MS is made when at least three of the following five risk determinants are present: waist circumference ≥ 90 cm in men and ≥ 80 cm in women; blood pressure > 130/85 mmHg or patient is taking antihypertensive medications; high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) < 0.9 mM in men and < 1.03 mM in women; fasting plasma glucose ≥ 5.6 mM or patient is undergoing regular treatment for diabetes mellitus; and triglyceride level ≥ 1.70 mM. Nevertheless, it would be useful if a simpler index is available for easy diagnosis of individuals at risk of MS in clinical settings.

Recently, Kahn proposed the use of lipid accumulation product (LAP), a novel index of central lipid accumulation, to predict the risk of MS [9]. LAP is based on a combination of waist circumference and plasma triglyceride levels. The LAP method was shown to predict diabetes [10] and recognize cardiovascular risk [11] better than body mass index (BMI) in previous studies. LAP was also associated with all-cause mortality in non-diabetic patients at high cardiovascular risk [12] and all-cause, cardiovascular, and congestive heart failure mortality in postmenopausal women [13]. In addition, LAP has been tested in the Chinese population for predicting diabetes. Analysis of areas under the curves (AUCs) for receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves indicated that LAP was able to predict diabetes better than waist-to-hip ratio, waist circumference, and BMI, in both men and women [14]. LAP has also been applied to healthy Argentinian men, with an AUC of 0.91 observed for MS [15]. With Taiwanese people, we conducted a cross-sectional study to assess the accuracy of LAP employing a number of adiposity measures. The adiposity measures included BMI, waist circumference, hip circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, and waist-to-height ratio, central obesity (defined as waist circumference ≥ 90 cm in males and ≥ 80 cm in females), and body adiposity index [8].

Methods

Study subjects

Study subjects were individuals recruited from a physical examination center at a regional hospital in southern Taiwan between May 2007 and April 2008. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the hospital, and written informed consent was provided by all participants before enrollment.

Demographic information and clinical measurements

Demographic information including age, sex, body weight, height, waist circumference, and hip circumference of the subjects was recorded. Waist circumference was measured at the umbilicus (with thin clothes worn), and hip circumference measured around the widest portion of the buttocks [16]. Subjects who were below 50 years or on lipid-lowering medications were excluded from the study. BMI was calculated by dividing weight (in kilograms) by the square of the height (in meters). Waist-to-hip and waist-to-height ratios, expressed as percentages, were determined by dividing waist circumference, respectively, by hip circumference or body height.

Clinical characteristics including sitting blood pressure, total cholesterol, HDL-C, triglyceride, and history of hypertension were also recorded. Blood samples were collected from each subject after a minimum eight-hour fasting period. Total cholesterol, HDL-C, triglyceride, and glucose were analyzed using an auto-analyzer (Sysmex XE-2100 Blood Cell Analyzer, Kobe, Japan).

Central obesity was defined as a waist circumference ≥ 90 cm in males and ≥ 80 cm in females. Body adiposity index (BAI) was calculated according to the method of Bergman and colleagues, where BAI = ((hip circumference [cm])/((height [m])1.5) − 18) [17]. The LAP was calculated as (waist circumference [cm] − 65) × (triglyceride concentration [mM]) for men, and (waist circumference [cm] − 58) × (triglyceride concentration [mM]) for women [11]. The formula includes the minimum sex-specific waist circumference values of 65 and 58 cm, for men and women, respectively [9]. In our sample, the minimum waist circumference values for men (62 cm) and women (61 cm) were approximately 5% different to those used in the original equation for the definition of LAP. MS-TW was defined in this study according to MS criteria for Taiwanese people [18].

Statistical analyses

Statistical analysis was performed using R software, version 2.12.1 (Free Software Foundation, Inc., Boston, MA, U.S.A.). A two-sided P value ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Summary data are represented as mean ± SD for continuous variables, and frequency and percentage for categorical variables. Simple logistic regression analysis was performed to test associations between MS-TW and various adiposity measures including LAP, waist-to-height ratio, BMI, waist circumference, central obesity, waist-to-hip ratio, and body adiposity index. A ROC analysis was conducted for each adiposity measures to evaluate their ability to correctly discriminate MS-TW. Plots of the sensitivity (true positive) versus 1 − specificity (false positive) were made and the overall diagnostic accuracy was quantified using AUCs. Values for each AUC can be between 0 and 1, with values greater than 0.5 desirable. A value of 1 signifies perfect diagnostic accuracy. A parameter possesses accurate diagnostic sensibility when the AUC value is greater than 0.75 [19].

AUCs of the adiposity measures were ranked in decreasing order of their values and then the adiposity measure that exhibited the greatest AUC value was compared with the next highest AUC value, and so on. Comparisons were made by applying the ROC test of DeLong using the roc.test function of the pROC library in R. Sensitivity, specificity, along with positive and negative predictive values were also estimated. The optimal cut-off was calculated as the minimum value of the square root of [(1 − sensitivity)2 + (1 − specificity)2[20], using the pROC coords function with the “closest.topleft” option selected.

Results

Basic characteristics for the 513 study subjects are presented in Table 1. The mean age of subjects was 59.1 ± 7.0 years. Around 20.5% of subjects were classified as having MS according to MS-TW criteria, with no significant differences in the prevalence between males and females.
Table 1

Basic characteristics of study subjects ( n= 513)

Variable

Mean

Male (n = 266)

Female (n = 247)

P

Age (years)

59.1 ± 7.0

59.3 ± 6.9*

58.8 ± 7.0

0.226

Hypertension, n (%)

146 (28.5)

85 (32.0)

61(24.7)

0.069

Diabetes, n (%)

49 (9.6)

28 (10.5)

21 (8.5)

0.436

Waist circumference (cm)

80.0 ± 8.6

84.0 ± 7.6

75.6 ± 7.3

< 0.001

Central obesity, n (%)

114 (22.2)

50 (18.8)

64 (25.9)

0.053

Hip circumference (cm)

92.5 ± 5.4

92.4 ± 5.3

92.6 ± 5.4

0.692

Waist-to-hip ratio (%)

86.4 ± 7.2

91.7 ± 5.4

81.7 ± 5.9

< 0.001

WHtR (%)

49.8 ± 4.9

50.6 ± 4.5

48.9 ± 5.1

< 0.001

BMI (kg/m2)

24.2 ± 3.0

24.5 ± 2.7

23.9 ± 3.0

0.005

Body adiposity index

27.6 ± 3.9

25.2 ± 2.7

30.1 ± 3.4

< 0.001

Systolic blood pressure (mmHg)

130 ± 19

128 ± 18

132 ± 20

0.007

Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg)

76 ± 12

79 ± 11

72 ± 12

< 0.001

Total cholesterol (mM)

5.09 ± 0.92

4.97 ± 0.96

5.21 ± 0.85

0.001

Total cholesterol ≥ 6.22 mM, n (%)

52 (10.1)

21 (7.9)

31 (12.6)

0.081

HDL-C (mM)

1.40 ± 0.39

1.28 ± 0.36

1.52 ± 0.39

< 0.001

HDL-C < 0.9 mM in men or < 1.03 mM in women, n (%)

128 (25.0)

54 (20.3)

74 (30.0)

0.012

Triglyceride (mM)

1.33 ± 0.78

1.42 ± 0.85

1.22 ± 0.70

0.002

Triglyceride ≥ 1.70 mM, n (%)

121 (23.6)

70 (26.3)

51 (20.6)

0.131

Fasting glucose (mM)

5.25 ± 1.08

5.29 ± 1.10

5.19 ± 1.05

0.127

Fasting glucose ≥ 5.6 mM, n (%)

95 (18.5)

56 (21.1)

39 (15.8)

0.125

MS-TW, n (%)

105 (20.5)

52 (19.5)

53 (21.5)

0.592

LAP

25.9 ± 21.6

23.0 ± 23.2

28.6 ± 19.3

0.001

*Values are mean ± standard deviation except otherwise denoted.

Central obesity: waist circumference ≥ 90 cm in males and ≥ 80 cm in females.

Body adiposity index: (hip circumference/height1.5) − 18.

Hypertension: subjects with a history of hypertension or using antihypertensive medications.

HDL-C high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, MS-TW: metabolic syndrome criteria for Taiwanese, WHtR waist-to-height ratio, BMI body mass index, LAP lipid accumulation product.

Male subjects had significantly greater waist circumferences, waist-to-hip and waist-to-height ratios, BMIs, diastolic blood pressure, and triglyceride levels compared with female subjects. However, female subjects had significantly higher body adiposity indices, systolic blood pressure, total cholesterol, HDL-C levels, and LAP compared with male subjects.

Simple logistic regression analysis indicated that all adiposity measures were significantly associated with MS-TW (Table 2). Regarding the diagnostic accuracy for MS-TW, LAP showed the highest AUC value (0.90; 95% CI, 0.87–0.93), followed by waist-to-height ratio (0.81; 95% CI, 0.77–0.86). The AUC for LAP was significantly higher than that of the waist-to-height ratio (P < 0.001). The AUC corresponding to waist-to-height ratio was significantly higher than that for BMI (P = 0.040). There were no significant differences between the remaining adiposity measures and AUCs. ROC curves with the three highest AUC values were plotted and presented in Figure 1. The codes for calculating the probability of MS in R, Microsoft Excel, or OpenOffice Calc are provided in Additional File 1.
Table 2

Simple logistic regression and AUC values for adiposity measures of MS using Taiwanese criteria (MS-TW)

Adiposity measure

Odds ratio (95% CI)

Area under curve (95% CI)

 

Total

Male

Female

Total

Male

Female

LAP

1.09 (1.08–1.12)

1.10 (1.07–1.13)

1.12 (1.08–1.15)

0.901a (0.870–0.932)

0.916c (0.880–0.953)

0.901d (0.855–0.946)

WHtR (%)

1.32 (1.24–1.41)

1.40 (1.27–1.56)

1.28 (1.19–1.40)

0.813b (0.767–0.860)

0.827 (0.762–0.892)

0.819 (0.755–0.883)

BMI (kg/m2)

1.45 (1.33–1.59)

1.49 (1.31–1.72)

1.43 (1.27–1.63)

0.780 (0.733–0.827)

0.776 (0.709–0.844)

0.793 (0.726–0.859)

Waist circumference (cm)

1.14 (1.10–1.17)

1.21 (1.15–1.29)

1.20 (1.14–1.27)

0.766 (0.715–0.816)

0.825 (0.760–0.890)

0.817 (0.755–0.879)

Central obesity

11.90 (7.32–19.69)

17.42 (8.48–37.32)

8.68 (4.47–17.32)

0.749 (0.700–0.799)

0.766 (0.696–0.835)

0.731 (0.661–0.802)

BMI  25 (kg/m2)

6.60 (4.13–10.79)

5.79 (2.98–11.90)

8.12 (4.20–16.36)

0.720 (0.672–0.768)

0.704 (0.637–0.772)

0.738 (0.669–0.807)

Waist-to-hip ratio (%)

1.12 (1.09–1.16)

1.27 (1.18–1.37)

1.20 (1.13–1.28)

0.699 (0.643–0.754)

0.784 (0.715–0.852)

0.784 (0.720–0.849)

Body adiposity index

1.16 (1.10–1.23)

1.30 (1.16–1.48)

1.24 (1.13–1.37)

0.670 (0.614–0.725)

0.726 (0.653–0.799)

0.715 (0.637–0.794)

LAP lipid accumulation product, WHtR waist-to-height ratio, BMI body mass index, AUC area under the curve.

Central obesity: waist circumference ≥ 90 cm in males and ≥ 80 cm in females.

Body adiposity index: (hip circumference/height1.5) − 18.

Odds ratios for all adiposity measures were significant at P < 0.001.

a P < 0.001 between the AUC value for LAP and that of the WHtR.

b P = 0.040 between the AUC value for WHtR and that of BMI.

c P = 0.004 between the AUC value for LAP and that of the WHtR.

d P = 0.004 between the AUC value for LAP and that of the WHtR.

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2261-12-78/MediaObjects/12872_2012_Article_495_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

ROC curves for adiposity measures in predicting MS using Taiwanese criteria (MS-TW). ROC, receiver-operating characteristic; AUC, area under the curve; LAP, lipid accumulation product; WHtR, waist-to-height ratio; BMI, body mass index; MS, metabolic syndrome.

Because there were significant differences in LAP between sexes, logistic regression and ROC curve analyses were conducted separately for males and females (Table 2). The greatest AUC value for LAP was 0.92 (95% CI, 0.88–0.95) and 0.90 (95% CI, 0.86–0.95) in males and females, respectively. There were no significant differences between all comparisons of AUCs for adiposity measures in either sex except that the AUC for LAP was significantly higher than that for waist-to-height ratio in both males (P = 0.004) and females (P = 0.003).

ROC curve analyses revealed that the optimal cut-off value for LAP was 28.4 with a sensitivity of 85% (95% CI, 76–91%), a specificity of 83% (95% CI, 79–87%), a positive predictive value (PPV) of 57% (95% CI, 49–65%), a negative predictive value (NPV) of 96% (95% CI, 93–97%), and an AUC value for the prediction of MS of 0.84.

In males, the optimal cut-off value for LAP was 31.6 with sensitivity of 88% (95% CI, 77–96%), specificity of 82% (95% CI, 76–87%), PPV of 55% (95% CI, 44–66%), NPV of 97% (95% CI, 93–99%) and an AUC of 0.84 for the prediction of MS. In females, the optimal cut-off value for LAP was also 31.6, with a sensitivity of 66% (95% CI, 52–78%), specificity of 93% (95% CI, 88–96%), PPV of 71% (95% CI, 57–83%), NPV of 91% (95% CI, 86–95%) and an AUC value of 0.87 for the prediction of MS.

Discussion

We are the first to report that LAP has strong predictive accuracy, with an AUC of 0.90, for diagnosing MS in Taiwanese people. LAP is a simple indicator that requires only the determination of circulating triglycerides and measurement of waist circumference. Although waist-to-height ratio requires only a single anthropometric measurement of waist and height, the use of LAP as a predictor of MS is more advantageous. Waist circumference is unable to distinguish between visceral adipose tissue and subcutaneous adipose tissue. Visceral adiposity is more strongly associated with cardiometabolic risks compared with subcutaneous adipose tissue [21]. Visceral adipose tissue adipocytes have a higher rate of lipolysis and also produce more adipocytokines, such as interleukin-6 and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 [22]. Therefore, it is important to include a routinely applicable indicator for evaluation of visceral adiposity. Triglyceride has been reported as a significant correlate of visceral adipose tissue in healthy men, even after controlling for abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue [23]. Furthermore, the use of triglyceride levels in combination with waist circumference, termed hypertriglyceridemic waist, has been shown to be able to identify individuals with the greatest amount of visceral fat [24] and to be associated with increased risk of MS [25], diabetes [26], and coronary artery disease [27].

Our AUC results for LAP in MS were similar to those previously reported, and indicate the usefulness of LAP across different ethnic groups. The AUC for LAP in MS was 0.91 in a cross-sectional study of 552 healthy Argentinian men [15]. MS was defined using the revised diagnostic criteria of NCEP ATP III. Another study on 768 healthy Spanish adults also showed that LAP has the highest diagnostic accuracy for MS defined using NCEP ATP III and International Diabetes Federation criteria [28]. Moreover, a study of 40 Nigerian geriatric males reported an AUC of 0.937 for LAP in predicting MS [29].

There are some potential limitations regarding the interpretation of our results. First, a cross-sectional design was used. Future prospective studies examining MS should consider incorporating the AUC value for LAP to evaluate its utility in predicting MS and risks of cardiovascular diseases and diabetes. Second, the study results are applicable only to Taiwanese people 50 years and over. Third, individual lifestyle information, such as smoking and alcohol use, was not ascertained. These may potentially impact upon the association between obesity and MS.

Conclusions

LAP was found to be an accurate and simple method for predicting the risk of MS in Taiwanese people, and could be effectively used by clinicians. This simple clinical tool may help, in a primary care setting, to identify subjects who require further biochemical evaluation.

Abbreviations

LAP: 

Lipid accumulation product

MS: 

Metabolic syndrome

MS-TW: 

Metabolic syndrome criteria for Taiwanese

ROC: 

Receiver-operating characteristic

AUC: 

Area under the curve

BMI: 

Body mass index

HDL-C: 

High-density lipoprotein cholesterol

WHtR: 

Waist-to-height ratio.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by research grants from the Buddhist Dalin Tzu Chi General Hospital (No. DTCRD 98 (2)-07).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Family Medicine, Buddhist Dalin Tzu Chi General Hospital
(2)
Department of Biotechnology, Chia Nan University of Pharmacy & Science
(3)
Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto

References

  1. Chien KL, Hsu HC, Sung FC, Su TC, Chen MF, Lee YT: Metabolic syndrome as a risk factor for coronary heart disease and stroke: an 11-year prospective cohort in Taiwan community. Atherosclerosis. 2007, 194: 214-221. 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2006.07.033.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Mottillo S, Filion KB, Genest J, Joseph L, Pilote L, Poirier P, Rinfret S, Schiffrin EL, Eisenberg MJ: The metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular risk a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010, 56: 1113-1132. 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.05.034.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Grundy SM: Metabolic syndrome pandemic. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2008, 28: 629-636. 10.1161/ATVBAHA.107.151092.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Yanai H, Tomono Y, Ito K, Furutani N, Yoshida H, Tada N: The underlying mechanisms for development of hypertension in the metabolic syndrome. Nutr J. 2008, 7: 10-10.1186/1475-2891-7-10.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Wu SH, Liu Z, Ho SC: Metabolic syndrome and all-cause mortality: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Eur J Epidemiol. 2010, 25: 375-384. 10.1007/s10654-010-9459-z.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Alberti KG, Zimmet PZ: Definition, diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complications. Part 1: diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus provisional report of a WHO consultation. Diabet Med. 1998, 15: 539-553. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9136(199807)15:7<539::AID-DIA668>3.0.CO;2-S.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Grundy SM, Brewer HB, Cleeman JI, Smith SC, Lenfant C, American Heart Association; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute: Definition of metabolic syndrome: report of the national heart, lung, and blood institute/american heart association conference on scientific issues related to definition. Circulation. 2004, 109: 433-438. 10.1161/01.CIR.0000111245.75752.C6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III): Third report of the national cholesterol education program (ncep) expert panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (adult treatment panel iii) final report. Circulation. 2002, 106: 3143-3421.Google Scholar
  9. Kahn HS, Valdez R: Metabolic risks identified by the combination of enlarged waist and elevated triacylglycerol concentration. Am J Clin Nutr. 2003, 78: 928-934.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Kahn HS: The lipid accumulation product is better than BMI for identifying diabetes: a population-based comparison. Diabetes Care. 2006, 29: 151-153. 10.2337/diacare.29.01.06.dc05-1805.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Kahn HS: The “lipid accumulation product” performs better than the body mass index for recognizing cardiovascular risk: a population-based comparison. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2005, 5: 26-10.1186/1471-2261-5-26.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Ioachimescu AG, Brennan DM, Hoar BM, Hoogwerf BJ: The lipid accumulation product and all-cause mortality in patients at high cardiovascular risk: a PreCIS database study. Obesity. 2010, 18: 1836-1844. 10.1038/oby.2009.453.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Wehr E, Pilz S, Boehm BO, März W, Obermayer-Pietsch B: The lipid accumulation product is associated with increased mortality in normal weight postmenopausal women. Obesity. 2011, 19: 1873-1880. 10.1038/oby.2011.42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Yang C, Guo ZR, Hu XS, Zhou ZY, Wu M: A prospective study on the association between lipid accumulation product or body mass index and diabetes. (in Chinese) Chin J Epidemiol. 2010, 31: 5-8.Google Scholar
  15. Tellechea ML, Aranguren F, Martínez-Larrad MT, Serrano-Ríos M, Taverna MJ, Frechtel GD: Ability of lipid accumulation product to identify metabolic syndrome in healthy men from Buenos Aires. Diabetes Care. 2009, 32: e85-10.2337/dc08-2284.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. World Health Organization: Waist Circumference and Waist-Hip Ratio: Report of a WHO Expert Consultation. Geneva, 8-11 December, 2008. 2011, World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  17. Bergman RN, Stefanovski D, Buchanan TA, Sumner AE, Reynolds JC, Sebring NG, Xiang AH, Watanabe RM: A better index of body adiposity. Obesity. 2011, 19: 1083-1089. 10.1038/oby.2011.38.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Tan CE, Ma S, Wai D, Chew SK, Tai ES: Can we apply the national cholesterol education program adult treatment panel definition of the metabolic syndrome to asians?. Diabetes Care. 2004, 27: 1182-1186. 10.2337/diacare.27.5.1182.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ: A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology. 1983, 148: 839-843.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Perkins NJ, Schisterman EF: The inconsistency of “optimal” cutpoints obtained using two criteria based on the receiver operating characteristic curve. Am J Epidemiol. 2006, 163: 670-675. 10.1093/aje/kwj063.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Hamdy O, Porramatikul S, Al-Ozairi E: Metabolic obesity: the paradox between visceral and subcutaneous fat. Curr Diabetes Rev. 2006, 2: 367-373. 10.2174/1573399810602040367.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Freedland ES: Role of a critical visceral adipose tissue threshold (CVATT) in metabolic syndrome: implications for controlling dietary carbohydrates: a review. Nutr Metab. 2004, 1: 12-10.1186/1743-7075-1-12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Nguyen-Duy TB, Nichaman MZ, Church TS, Blair SN, Ross R: Visceral fat and liver fat are independent predictors of metabolic risk factors in men. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2003, 284: E1065-E1071.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Sam S, Haffner S, Davidson MH, D’Agostino RB, Feinstein S, Kondos G, Perez A, Mazzone T: Hypertriglyceridemic waist phenotype predicts increased visceral fat in subjects with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2009, 32: 1916-1920. 10.2337/dc09-0412.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Zainuddin LR, Isa N, Muda WM, Mohamed HJ: The prevalence of metabolic syndrome according to various definitions and hypertriglyceridemic-waist in Malaysian adults. Int J Prev Med. 2011, 2: 229-237.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Amini M, Esmaillzadeh A, Sadeghi M, Mehvarifar N, Amini M, Zare M: The association of hypertriglyceridemic waist phenotype with type 2 diabetes mellitus among individuals with first relative history of diabetes. J Res Med Sci. 2011, 16: 156-164.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Blackburn P, Lemieux I, Lamarche B, Bergeron J, Perron P, Tremblay G, Gaudet D, Després JP: Hypertriglyceridemic waist: a simple clinical phenotype associated with coronary artery disease in women. Metabolism. 2012, 61: 56-64. 10.1016/j.metabol.2011.05.017.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Taverna MJ, Martínez-Larrad MT, Frechtel GD, Serrano-Ríos M: Lipid accumulation product: a powerful marker of metabolic syndrome in healthy population. Eur J Endocrinol. 2011, 164: 559-567. 10.1530/EJE-10-1039.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Ejike CECC: Lipid accumulation product and waist-to-height ratio are predictors of the metabolic syndrome in a Nigerian male geriatric population. J Rural Trop Public Health. 2011, 10: 101-105.Google Scholar
  30. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2261/12/78/prepub

Copyright

© Chiang and Koo; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.