Systematic review: comparative effectiveness of adjunctive devices in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention of native vessels
© Sobieraj et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 13 September 2011
Accepted: 20 December 2011
Published: 20 December 2011
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|13 Sep 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|4 Oct 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ole Fröbert|
|10 Oct 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Anthony Bavry|
|28 Nov 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Diana Sobieraj|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|28 Nov 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|29 Nov 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Diana Sobieraj|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|29 Nov 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|20 Dec 2011||Editorially accepted|
|20 Dec 2011||Article published||10.1186/1471-2261-11-74|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.