Serum neuron-specific enolase as predictor of outcome in comatose cardiac-arrest survivors: a prospective cohort study
© Daubin et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 25 February 2011
Accepted: 8 August 2011
Published: 8 August 2011
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|25 Feb 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|20 Mar 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Johann Reisinger|
|11 Apr 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Hans Friberg|
|20 May 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Cedric Daubin|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|20 May 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|7 Jun 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Johann Reisinger|
|26 Jun 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Hans Friberg|
|11 Jul 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Cedric Daubin|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|11 Jul 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|8 Aug 2011||Editorially accepted|
|8 Aug 2011||Article published||10.1186/1471-2261-11-48|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.