Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Do changes in traditional coronary heart disease risk factors over time explain the association between socio-economic status and coronary heart disease?

  • Peter Franks1, 5Email author,
  • Paul C Winters2,
  • Daniel J Tancredi3, 6 and
  • Kevin A Fiscella4, 7
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders201111:28

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2261-11-28

Received: 16 November 2010

Accepted: 3 June 2011

Published: 3 June 2011

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
16 Nov 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
22 Dec 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Randi Foraker
22 Dec 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - kristal chichlowska
11 Jan 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Maurício Landim
20 Jan 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nico Dragano
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
29 Mar 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nico Dragano
1 Apr 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Randi Foraker
1 Apr 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - kristal chichlowska
17 May 2011 Author responded Author comments - Kevin Fiscella
Resubmission - Version 5
17 May 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
3 Jun 2011 Editorially accepted
3 Jun 2011 Article published 10.1186/1471-2261-11-28

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Center for Healthcare Policy and Research, University of California at Davis, University of California, Davis
(2)
Department of Family Medicine, University of Rochester
(3)
Center for Healthcare Policy and Research, University of California at Davis
(4)
Department of Family Medicine, University of Rochester
(5)
Department of Family & Community Medicine, University of California at Davis
(6)
Department of Pediatrics, University of California at Davis
(7)
Departments of Family Medicine and Community & Preventive Medicine, and Department of Oncology, Wilmot Cancer Center, University of Rochester

Advertisement