Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Accuracy of advanced versus strictly conventional 12-lead ECG for detection and screening of coronary artery disease, left ventricular hypertrophy and left ventricular systolic dysfunction

  • Todd T Schlegel1Email author,
  • Walter B Kulecz1,
  • Alan H Feiveson1,
  • E Carl Greco2,
  • Jude L DePalma3,
  • Vito Starc4,
  • Bojan Vrtovec4,
  • M Atiar Rahman5,
  • Michael W Bungo5,
  • Matthew J Hayat6,
  • Terry Bauch7,
  • Reynolds Delgado8,
  • Stafford G Warren9,
  • Tulio Núñez-Medina10,
  • Rubén Medina11,
  • Diego Jugo11,
  • Håkan Arheden12 and
  • Olle Pahlm12
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders201010:28

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2261-10-28

Received: 8 December 2009

Accepted: 16 June 2010

Published: 16 June 2010

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
8 Dec 2009 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
15 Jan 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Rautaharju M
24 Jan 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Elsayed Z. Soliman
5 Feb 2010 Author responded Author comments - Todd Schlegel
Resubmission - Version 3
5 Feb 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
5 Feb 2010 Author responded Author comments - Todd Schlegel
Resubmission - Version 4
5 Feb 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 4
5 Feb 2010 Author responded Author comments - Todd Schlegel
Resubmission - Version 5
5 Feb 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 5
26 Feb 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Elsayed Z. Soliman
20 Apr 2010 Author responded Author comments - Todd Schlegel
Resubmission - Version 6
20 Apr 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 6
11 Jun 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Elsayed Z. Soliman
14 Jun 2010 Author responded Author comments - Todd Schlegel
Resubmission - Version 7
14 Jun 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
16 Jun 2010 Editorially accepted
16 Jun 2010 Article published 10.1186/1471-2261-10-28

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Human Adaptation and Countermeasures Division, NASA Johnson Space Center
(2)
Department of Electrical Engineering, Arkansas Tech University
(3)
Department of Engineering, Colorado State University
(4)
Institute of Physiology, School of Medicine, University of Ljubljana
(5)
Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center
(6)
Biostatistics, School of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University
(7)
Division of Cardiology, University of Texas Health Science Center
(8)
Heart and Lung Treatment and Transplant Center, Texas Heart Institute
(9)
Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory, Thomas Memorial Hospital
(10)
Instituto de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares, Universidad de los Andes
(11)
Grupo de Ingenieria Biomedica, Universidad de Los Andes
(12)
Department of Clinical Physiology, Lund University Hospital

Advertisement