Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Cost-utility of enoxaparin compared with unfractionated heparin in unstable coronary artery disease

BMC Cardiovascular Disorders20011:2

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2261-1-2

Received: 11 April 2001

Accepted: 15 October 2001

Published: 15 October 2001

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
11 Apr 2001 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
11 Jun 2001 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Bergqvist
22 Jun 2001 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Franco Sassi
7 Aug 2001 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jean-Pierre Boissel
29 Aug 2001 Author responded Author comments - Tricia Nicholson
Resubmission - Version 3
29 Aug 2001 Submitted Manuscript version 3
9 Oct 2001 Author responded Author comments - Tricia Nicholson
Resubmission - Version 4
9 Oct 2001 Submitted Manuscript version 4
12 Oct 2001 Author responded Author comments - Tricia Nicholson
Resubmission - Version 5
12 Oct 2001 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
15 Oct 2001 Editorially accepted
15 Oct 2001 Article published 10.1186/1471-2261-1-2

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Wessex Institute for Health Research and Development, University of Southampton
(2)
Economics Department, City University

Advertisement