Cost-utility of enoxaparin compared with unfractionated heparin in unstable coronary artery disease
© Nicholson et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2001
Received: 11 April 2001
Accepted: 15 October 2001
Published: 15 October 2001
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|11 Apr 2001||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|11 Jun 2001||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - David Bergqvist|
|22 Jun 2001||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Franco Sassi|
|7 Aug 2001||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jean-Pierre Boissel|
|29 Aug 2001||Author responded||Author comments - Tricia Nicholson|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|29 Aug 2001||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|9 Oct 2001||Author responded||Author comments - Tricia Nicholson|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|9 Oct 2001||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|12 Oct 2001||Author responded||Author comments - Tricia Nicholson|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|12 Oct 2001||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|15 Oct 2001||Editorially accepted|
|15 Oct 2001||Article published||10.1186/1471-2261-1-2|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.